IAG vs. PETS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS).

Performance

IAG vs. PETS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IAG vs. PETS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation	14.13%	219.57%	103.95%	-1.94%	-17.57%	-14.71%	-1.61%	1.36%	-36.88%	51.43%
PETS PetMed Express, Inc.	-28.75%	-33.61%	-36.24%	-54.76%	-25.83%	-18.17%	41.49%	6.52%	-47.35%	102.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap IAG : $10.93B PETS : $47.90M
EPS IAG : $1.15 PETS : -$3.11
PS Ratio IAG : 3.81 PETS : 0.26
PB Ratio IAG : 2.61 PETS : 1.46
Total Revenue (TTM) IAG : $2.87B PETS : $182.67M
Gross Profit (TTM) IAG : $1.21B PETS : $52.94M
EBITDA (TTM) IAG : $1.51B PETS : -$48.68M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAG achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than PETS's -28.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IAG has outperformed PETS with an annualized return of 23.61%, while PETS has yielded a comparatively lower -15.97% annualized return.

IAG

• 1D: 7.54%
• 1M: -23.40%
• YTD: 14.13%
• 6M: 45.55%
• 1Y: 201.12%
• 3Y*: 90.79%
• 5Y*: 43.07%
• 10Y*: 23.61%

PETS

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -16.79%
• YTD: -28.75%
• 6M: -9.16%
• 1Y: -45.58%
• 3Y*: -47.28%
• 5Y*: -40.04%
• 10Y*: -15.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IAG vs. PETS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAG

IAG Risk / Return Rank: 95
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 96

PETS

PETS Risk / Return Rank: 18
PETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
PETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
PETS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
PETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
PETS Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAG vs. PETS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IAG	PETS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.23	-0.46	+3.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	-0.37	+3.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	0.95	+0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.76	-0.74	+6.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.44	-1.47	+18.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IAG vs. PETS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAG Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the PETS Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAG and PETS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IAG	PETS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.23	-0.46	+3.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	-0.57	+1.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	-0.26	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	-0.03	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between IAG and PETS is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IAG vs. PETS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAG nor PETS has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PETS PetMed Express, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.90%	6.78%	4.67%	3.46%	4.59%	4.47%	1.74%	3.25%	4.14%

Drawdowns

IAG vs. PETS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAG drawdown since its inception was -95.55%, roughly equal to the maximum PETS drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG and PETS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAG	PETS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.55%	-98.29%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.60%	-61.81%	+27.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.52%	-96.03%	+21.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.46%	-96.40%	+9.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.40%	-94.88%	+71.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.44%	-44.01%	-12.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.42%	31.10%	-19.68%

Volatility

IAG vs. PETS - Volatility Comparison

IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a higher volatility of 20.42% compared to PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) at 10.86%. This indicates that IAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PETS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IAG	PETS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.42%	10.86%	+9.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.69%	81.30%	-32.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.70%	99.13%	-36.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.89%	70.15%	-10.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.14%	62.50%	-3.36%

Financials

IAG vs. PETS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IAMGOLD Corporation and PetMed Express, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 595.72M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.

PETS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.46M and revenue of 40.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.3%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 576.53M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.2%.

PETS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.47M and revenue of 40.66M, resulting in an operating margin of -25.8%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 412.85M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.

PETS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported a net income of -10.55M and revenue of 40.66M, resulting in a net margin of -26.0%.