PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSD vs. AAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSD vs. AAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) and Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSD achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than AAA's 2.17% return.


HYSD

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.95%
YTD
2.33%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAA

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.49%
6M
2.01%
YTD
2.17%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSD vs. AAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYSD and AAA is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSD vs. AAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSD
HYSD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HYSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AAA
AAA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSD vs. AAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) and Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYSDAAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

8.29

-4.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.25

27.84

-9.58

HYSD vs. AAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the AAA Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSD and AAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYSD vs. AAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSD drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, roughly equal to the maximum AAA drawdown of -2.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSD and AAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSDAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-2.63%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-0.60%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.31%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-0.31%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.18%

+0.15%

Volatility

HYSD vs. AAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) is 0.56%, while Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) has a volatility of 0.72%. This indicates that HYSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSDAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.72%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

1.72%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

2.32%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.45%

2.31%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.45%

2.15%

+1.30%

HYSD vs. AAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSD has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than AAA's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYSD vs. AAA - Dividend Comparison

HYSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than AAA's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AAA
Alternative Access First Priority CLO Bond ETF
4.82%5.11%6.17%6.11%2.78%1.06%0.32%
HYSD
Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
5.82%5.60%1.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYSD and AAA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAA has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to HYSD (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSD dropped -2.69% vs AAA's -2.63%.

On 1-year performance, HYSD leads with 5.96% vs 4.98% for AAA. On fees, AAA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HYSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYSD has performed better with a 5.96% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for HYSD.

HYSD has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 4.82% for AAA.

HYSD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while AAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Alternative Access Funds LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for HYSD and 0.25% for AAA.

AAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSD and AAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer