HYP vs. PJFG
HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) and PJFG (PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PJFG.
Performance
HYP vs. PJFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYP achieves a 32.89% return, which is significantly higher than PJFG's 6.93% return.
HYP
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 32.89%
- 6M
- 28.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJFG
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 6.68%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 19.48%
- 3Y*
- 24.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYP vs. PJFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 32.89% | -5.01% |
PJFG PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF | 6.93% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYP and PJFG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYP vs. PJFG — Risk / Return Rank
HYP
PJFG
HYP vs. PJFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYP | PJFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.36 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
HYP vs. PJFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYP drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, smaller than the maximum PJFG drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYP and PJFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYP | PJFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.58% | -24.24% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.90% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -3.74% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.04% | — |
Volatility
HYP vs. PJFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYP | PJFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.91% | 16.82% | +24.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.91% | 20.86% | +20.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.91% | 20.86% | +20.05% |
HYP vs. PJFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PJFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYP vs. PJFG - Dividend Comparison
HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while PJFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 0.10% | 0.14% |
PJFG PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYP and PJFG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PJFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PJFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.
HYP has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for PJFG.
They also come from different issuers: Golden Eagle and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYP and 0.75% for PJFG.
Find the right allocation for HYP and PJFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer