HYP vs. LFEQ
HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) and LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. HYP is actively managed, while LFEQ is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for LFEQ.
Performance
HYP vs. LFEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYP achieves a 26.28% return, which is significantly higher than LFEQ's 7.64% return.
HYP
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 26.28%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFEQ
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 7.64%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
HYP vs. LFEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 26.28% | -6.61% |
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 7.64% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYP and LFEQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYP vs. LFEQ — Risk / Return Rank
HYP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LFEQ
HYP vs. LFEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYP | LFEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYP vs. LFEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYP drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, smaller than the maximum LFEQ drawdown of -35.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYP and LFEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYP | LFEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.58% | -35.19% | +15.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -3.29% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -6.13% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
HYP vs. LFEQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYP | LFEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.24% | 12.51% | +30.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.24% | 14.46% | +28.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.24% | 17.58% | +25.66% |
HYP vs. LFEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LFEQ's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYP vs. LFEQ - Dividend Comparison
HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than LFEQ's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 0.84% | 0.90% | 0.74% | 1.56% | 1.19% | 0.37% | 2.06% | 1.45% | 1.07% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYP and LFEQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LFEQ is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LFEQ is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.
LFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.11% for HYP.
They also come from different issuers: Golden Eagle and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYP and 0.58% for LFEQ.
Find the right allocation for HYP and LFEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer