PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLMD vs. WBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RLMD vs. WBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. (RLMD) and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLMD achieves a 32.92% return, which is significantly higher than WBD's -5.69% return. Over the past 10 years, RLMD has underperformed WBD with an annualized return of -5.28%, while WBD has yielded a comparatively higher -0.43% annualized return.


RLMD

1D
-6.28%
1M
-15.97%
YTD
32.92%
6M
58.91%
1Y
806.14%
3Y*
31.40%
5Y*
-26.71%
10Y*
-5.28%

WBD

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-5.69%
6M
10.80%
1Y
171.80%
3Y*
32.25%
5Y*
-2.99%
10Y*
-0.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLMD vs. WBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLMD
Relmada Therapeutics, Inc.
32.92%828.85%-87.44%18.62%-84.51%-29.75%-17.77%747.83%53.33%-31.19%
WBD
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
-5.69%172.66%-7.12%20.04%-59.73%-21.77%-8.09%32.34%10.55%-18.35%

Correlation

The correlation between RLMD and WBD is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RLMD:

$555.95M

WBD:

$67.73B

EPS

RLMD:

-$1.06

WBD:

-$0.86

PB Ratio

RLMD:

2.54

WBD:

2.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

RLMD:

$0.00

WBD:

$37.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RLMD:

$0.00

WBD:

$15.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

RLMD:

-$60.34M

WBD:

$9.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLMD vs. WBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLMD
RLMD Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RLMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
RLMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

WBD
WBD Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
WBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBD Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
WBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLMD vs. WBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. (RLMD) and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLMDWBDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.62

3.66

+2.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.60

5.54

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.75

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

21.13

8.10

+13.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

48.78

23.86

+24.92

RLMD vs. WBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLMD Sharpe Ratio is 6.62, which is higher than the WBD Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLMD and WBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLMDWBDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.62

3.66

+2.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

-0.06

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

-0.01

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.16

-0.31

Drawdowns

RLMD vs. WBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLMD drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, which is greater than WBD's maximum drawdown of -91.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLMD and WBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLMDWBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.66%

-91.32%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.78%

-21.31%

-14.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.30%

-53.63%

-42.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.32%

-78.73%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.50%

-91.32%

-8.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.37%

-64.82%

-26.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.70%

-37.10%

-42.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.50%

7.23%

+8.27%

Volatility

RLMD vs. WBD - Volatility Comparison

Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. (RLMD) has a higher volatility of 20.29% compared to Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) at 2.54%. This indicates that RLMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLMDWBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.29%

2.54%

+17.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.52%

14.53%

+54.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

123.22%

47.29%

+75.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

116.20%

52.76%

+63.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.30%

47.18%

+67.12%

Dividends

RLMD vs. WBD - Dividend Comparison

Neither RLMD nor WBD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RLMD vs. WBD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B202220232024202520260
8.89B
(RLMD) Total Revenue
(WBD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RLMD and WBD have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLMD has higher volatility (20.29%) compared to WBD (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLMD dropped -99.66% vs WBD's -91.32%.

RLMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.62 vs 3.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLMD and WBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer