HYMC vs. FRES.L
HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) and FRES.L (Fresnillo plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — HYMC in Gold, FRES.L in Other Precious Metals & Mining. Over the past 5 years, HYMC returned -4.20%/yr vs 30.92%/yr for FRES.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HYMC vs. FRES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HYMC is traded in USD, while FRES.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FRES.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly higher than FRES.L's -17.27% return.
HYMC
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -29.20%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 647.60%
- 3Y*
- 99.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
FRES.L
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -17.84%
- YTD
- -17.27%
- 6M
- -19.22%
- 1Y
- 89.41%
- 3Y*
- 72.83%
- 5Y*
- 30.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
HYMC vs. FRES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | -1.56% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -92.18% | -24.03% | 4.59% | 3.35% |
FRES.L Fresnillo plc | -17.27% | 511.09% | 4.36% | -29.44% | -7.20% | -19.52% | 84.40% | -20.96% | -34.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYMC and FRES.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, HYMC and FRES.L have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
HYMC:
$2.10B
FRES.L:
£20.20B
HYMC:
-$1.44
FRES.L:
$2.08
HYMC:
9.38
FRES.L:
5.77
HYMC:
$0.00
FRES.L:
$8.03B
HYMC:
-$4.65M
FRES.L:
$3.75B
HYMC:
-$69.17M
FRES.L:
$3.90B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYMC vs. FRES.L — Risk / Return Rank
HYMC
FRES.L
HYMC vs. FRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYMC | FRES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.26 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.70 | 2.28 | +8.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.26 | 5.31 | +20.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYMC vs. FRES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than FRES.L's maximum drawdown of -86.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and FRES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYMC | FRES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.89% | -86.88% | -12.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.07% | -38.99% | -22.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.45% | -38.99% | -24.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.90% | -55.86% | -38.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.21% | -38.99% | -46.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -48.28% | -15.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.84% | 16.77% | +8.07% |
Volatility
HYMC vs. FRES.L - Volatility Comparison
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a higher volatility of 26.56% compared to Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) at 17.06%. This indicates that HYMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYMC | FRES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.56% | 17.06% | +9.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.12% | 45.57% | +40.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.45% | 57.89% | +60.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.82% | 45.68% | +107.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.79% | 45.39% | +77.40% |
Dividends
HYMC vs. FRES.L - Dividend Comparison
HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRES.L Fresnillo plc | 3.47% | 2.00% | 1.36% | 1.98% | 2.44% | 2.66% | 1.00% | 2.35% | 3.49% | 1.73% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HYMC vs. FRES.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation and Fresnillo plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HYMC and FRES.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HYMC and FRES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer