PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FRES.L vs. HL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FRES.LHL
YTD Return7.83%16.99%
1Y Return17.86%32.89%
3Y Return (Ann)-11.00%-3.31%
5Y Return (Ann)2.80%19.21%
10Y Return (Ann)0.67%8.71%
Sharpe Ratio0.490.61
Sortino Ratio0.971.25
Omega Ratio1.111.14
Calmar Ratio0.260.39
Martin Ratio1.582.21
Ulcer Index12.28%14.87%
Daily Std Dev39.03%53.82%
Max Drawdown-82.36%-97.96%
Current Drawdown-61.10%-75.62%

Fundamentals


FRES.LHL
Market Cap£4.75B$3.48B
EPS£0.25-$0.07
PEG Ratio0.00-3.02
Total Revenue (TTM)£2.85B$1.17B
Gross Profit (TTM)£609.46M$122.36M
EBITDA (TTM)£954.39M$222.71M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between FRES.L and HL is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FRES.L vs. HL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FRES.L achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than HL's 16.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FRES.L has underperformed HL with an annualized return of 0.67%, while HL has yielded a comparatively higher 8.71% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.95%
2.32%
FRES.L
HL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRES.L vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRES.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.49
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.97
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.62
HL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HL, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HL, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HL, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HL, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HL, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.38

FRES.L vs. HL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRES.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the HL Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRES.L and HL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.49
0.39
FRES.L
HL

Dividends

FRES.L vs. HL - Dividend Comparison

FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than HL's 0.57% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
1.69%2.47%3.04%3.74%1.26%3.01%4.71%2.28%0.74%0.61%0.91%6.04%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.57%0.50%0.40%0.71%0.28%0.35%0.51%0.30%0.28%0.63%0.43%0.71%

Drawdowns

FRES.L vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRES.L drawdown since its inception was -82.36%, smaller than the maximum HL drawdown of -97.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRES.L and HL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-68.25%
-47.32%
FRES.L
HL

Volatility

FRES.L vs. HL - Volatility Comparison

Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) and Hecla Mining Company (HL) have volatilities of 15.69% and 15.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.69%
15.04%
FRES.L
HL

Financials

FRES.L vs. HL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fresnillo plc and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. FRES.L values in GBp, HL values in USD