PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGV vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGV vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGV achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 14.66% return.


HYGV

1D
0.53%
1M
0.72%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.99%
1Y
6.90%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*

IJH

1D
2.51%
1M
2.96%
YTD
14.66%
6M
11.74%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGV vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
1.71%7.92%8.02%12.11%-12.60%5.93%8.01%15.76%-4.15%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
14.66%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-16.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGV and IJH is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.69

The correlation between HYGV and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYGV vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYGV
IJH

Energy

100.0%
5.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Communication Services

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.8%

Financial Services

-

14.4%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Industrials

-

25.0%

Real Estate

-

7.5%

Technology

-

15.7%

Utilities

-

3.1%

Energy

HYGV
100.0%
IJH
5.5%

Basic Materials

HYGV

-

IJH
4.8%

Communication Services

HYGV

-

IJH
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HYGV

-

IJH
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

HYGV

-

IJH
3.8%

Financial Services

HYGV

-

IJH
14.4%

Healthcare

HYGV

-

IJH
8.6%

Industrials

HYGV

-

IJH
25.0%

Real Estate

HYGV

-

IJH
7.5%

Technology

HYGV

-

IJH
15.7%

Utilities

HYGV

-

IJH
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGV vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGV
HYGV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HYGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGV vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGVIJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.87

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

10.47

+0.64

HYGV vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGV and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGV vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGV drawdown since its inception was -23.47%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGV and IJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGVIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.47%

-55.07%

+31.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-8.83%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.56%

-24.10%

+18.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.12%

-24.10%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-7.56%

+4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

2.41%

-1.79%

Volatility

HYGV vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) is 1.20%, while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that HYGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGVIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

5.07%

-3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

11.85%

-8.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

15.89%

-11.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.59%

19.80%

-12.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.19%

21.20%

-12.01%

HYGV vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGV has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGV vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

HYGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than IJH's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
7.38%7.48%8.20%8.77%7.64%6.07%6.18%7.95%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.18%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGV and IJH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJH has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to HYGV (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGV dropped -23.47% vs IJH's -55.07%.

On 5-year performance, IJH leads with 8.10% vs 3.44% for HYGV. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IJH has performed better with a 8.10% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HYGV.

HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.38%, compared with 1.18% for IJH.

HYGV is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for HYGV and 0.05% for IJH.

HYGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGV and IJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer