HYGV vs. IJH
HYGV (FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYGV is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index, while IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYGV returned 3.44%/yr vs 8.10%/yr for IJH. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYGV charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
HYGV vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYGV achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 14.66% return.
HYGV
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 6.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
IJH
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
HYGV vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 1.71% | 7.92% | 8.02% | 12.11% | -12.60% | 5.93% | 8.01% | 15.76% | -4.15% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.66% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -16.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYGV and IJH is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018 | 0.69 |
The correlation between HYGV and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYGV vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYGV
IJH
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
HYGV
IJH
Basic Materials
HYGV
-
IJH
Communication Services
HYGV
-
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
HYGV
-
IJH
Consumer Defensive
HYGV
-
IJH
Financial Services
HYGV
-
IJH
Healthcare
HYGV
-
IJH
Industrials
HYGV
-
IJH
Real Estate
HYGV
-
IJH
Technology
HYGV
-
IJH
Utilities
HYGV
-
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYGV vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
HYGV
IJH
HYGV vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYGV | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.87 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 10.47 | +0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYGV vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYGV drawdown since its inception was -23.47%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGV and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYGV | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.47% | -55.07% | +31.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -8.83% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.56% | -24.10% | +18.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.12% | -24.10% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -7.56% | +4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | 2.41% | -1.79% |
Volatility
HYGV vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) is 1.20%, while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that HYGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYGV | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 5.07% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 11.85% | -8.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90% | 15.89% | -11.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 19.80% | -12.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.19% | 21.20% | -12.01% |
HYGV vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYGV has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYGV vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
HYGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than IJH's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 7.38% | 7.48% | 8.20% | 8.77% | 7.64% | 6.07% | 6.18% | 7.95% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYGV and IJH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJH has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to HYGV (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGV dropped -23.47% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 5-year performance, IJH leads with 8.10% vs 3.44% for HYGV. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IJH has performed better with a 8.10% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HYGV.
HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.38%, compared with 1.18% for IJH.
HYGV is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for HYGV and 0.05% for IJH.
HYGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYGV and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer