PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYDB vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYDB vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYDB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.


HYDB

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.87%
1Y
7.20%
3Y*
9.11%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYDB vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
1.32%8.10%9.11%14.02%-9.99%5.14%7.39%16.13%-3.18%3.38%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.27%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between HYDB and TLT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2017

0.18

Over the past year, HYDB and TLT have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYDB vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYDB
HYDB Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYDB vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYDBTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.09

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

0.65

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.30

1.63

+9.67

HYDB vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYDB Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYDB and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYDBTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.51

+1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

-0.40

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.26

+0.46

Drawdowns

HYDB vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYDB drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDB and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDBTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.58%

-48.35%

+26.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-7.58%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.58%

-19.18%

+13.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.28%

-43.70%

+29.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-40.44%

+40.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-13.82%

+11.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

3.04%

-2.40%

Volatility

HYDB vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) is 1.13%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that HYDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYDBTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

2.76%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

6.50%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

9.77%

-5.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.04%

15.87%

-8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

14.91%

-7.15%

HYDB vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYDB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYDB vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

HYDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
7.00%7.04%6.95%7.00%6.30%4.70%5.81%5.68%6.16%2.70%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYDB and TLT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLT has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to HYDB (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDB dropped -21.58% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 5-year performance, HYDB leads with 4.67% vs -6.31% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HYDB has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYDB has performed better with a 4.67% return vs -6.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYDB.

HYDB has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 4.59% for TLT.

HYDB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TLT is Government Bonds. HYDB tracks BlackRock High Yield Defensive Bond Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYDB and 0.15% for TLT.

HYDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYDB and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer