PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYDB vs. SHYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYDB vs. SHYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYDB achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than SHYG's 1.72% return.


HYDB

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.60%
1Y
6.31%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*

SHYG

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.94%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
4.78%
10Y*
5.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYDB vs. SHYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
1.47%8.10%9.11%14.02%-9.99%5.14%7.39%16.13%-3.18%3.38%
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.72%7.94%8.17%10.38%-4.71%4.60%3.15%9.93%0.02%1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HYDB and SHYG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017

0.87

The correlation between HYDB and SHYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYDB vs. SHYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYDB
HYDB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HYDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDB Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SHYG
SHYG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SHYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYDB vs. SHYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYDBSHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.46

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.85

14.95

-5.10

HYDB vs. SHYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYDB Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SHYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYDB and SHYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYDB vs. SHYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYDB drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, which is greater than SHYG's maximum drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDB and SHYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDBSHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.58%

-19.26%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-1.75%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.58%

-4.53%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.28%

-9.39%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.16%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-1.44%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

0.40%

+0.24%

Volatility

HYDB vs. SHYG - Volatility Comparison

iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) at 0.83%. This indicates that HYDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYDBSHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

0.83%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

2.57%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84%

3.20%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.05%

5.74%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.74%

6.41%

+1.33%

HYDB vs. SHYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYDB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SHYG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYDB vs. SHYG - Dividend Comparison

HYDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, which matches SHYG's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
6.99%7.04%6.95%7.00%6.30%4.70%5.81%5.68%6.16%2.70%0.00%0.00%
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.00%7.03%6.93%6.54%5.57%4.83%5.07%5.33%5.90%5.49%5.53%5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, HYDB and SHYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HYDB has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to SHYG (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDB dropped -21.58% vs SHYG's -19.26%.

On 5-year performance, SHYG leads with 4.78% vs 4.57% for HYDB. On fees, SHYG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SHYG has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SHYG has performed better with a 4.78% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHYG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYDB.

SHYG has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 6.99% for HYDB.

HYDB tracks BlackRock High Yield Defensive Bond Index, while SHYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield 0-5 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYDB and 0.30% for SHYG.

SHYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYDB and SHYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer