HYBL vs. PHYD
HYBL (SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF) and PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYBL returned 8.66%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for PHYD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYBL charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PHYD.
Performance
HYBL vs. PHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYBL achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than PHYD's 2.49% return.
HYBL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 6.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHYD
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 7.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYBL vs. PHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBL SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF | 1.11% | 7.78% | 9.12% | 8.81% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 2.49% | 8.84% | 7.35% | 8.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYBL and PHYD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between HYBL and PHYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYBL vs. PHYD — Risk / Return Rank
HYBL
PHYD
HYBL vs. PHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYBL | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.49 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 3.82 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.42 | 15.70 | -6.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYBL | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.39 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 1.74 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
HYBL vs. PHYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYBL drawdown since its inception was -8.46%, which is greater than PHYD's maximum drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBL and PHYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYBL | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -4.33% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | -2.10% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.32% | -4.14% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.62% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -0.62% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.51% | +0.15% |
Volatility
HYBL vs. PHYD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL) is 0.68%, while Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that HYBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYBL | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 1.07% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.14% | 2.56% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 3.35% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 4.59% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 4.59% | -0.02% |
HYBL vs. PHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYBL has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PHYD's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYBL vs. PHYD - Dividend Comparison
HYBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, less than PHYD's 9.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBL SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF | 7.12% | 7.22% | 7.88% | 7.93% | 5.10% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 9.02% | 6.63% | 6.80% | 6.15% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYBL and PHYD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHYD has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to HYBL (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBL dropped -8.46% vs PHYD's -4.33%.
On 3-year performance, PHYD leads with 8.82% vs 8.66% for HYBL. On fees, PHYD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, HYBL has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 8.82% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PHYD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HYBL.
PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 9.02%, compared with 7.12% for HYBL.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HYBL and 0.55% for PHYD.
PHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYBL and PHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer