PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYBL vs. VCRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYBL vs. VCRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL) and Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBL achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than VCRB's 0.24% return.


HYBL

1D
0.09%
1M
0.72%
6M
1.89%
YTD
1.98%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
8.34%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.66%

VCRB

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.61%
6M
-0.06%
YTD
0.24%
1Y
2.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.06M$2.73M$2.96M
$39.45M$39.09M$40.80M

HYBL vs. VCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYBL
State Street Blackstone High Income ETF
1.98%7.78%9.12%1.69%
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
0.24%7.56%2.21%0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between HYBL and VCRB is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYBL vs. VCRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYBL
HYBL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HYBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VCRB
VCRB Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYBL vs. VCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL) and Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYBLVCRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.13

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.01

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

2.51

+5.23

HYBL vs. VCRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the VCRB Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBL and VCRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYBL vs. VCRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBL drawdown since its inception was -8.46%, which is greater than VCRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBL and VCRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYBLVCRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-4.59%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-2.63%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.62%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-1.18%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

1.05%

-0.39%

Volatility

HYBL vs. VCRB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL) is 0.41%, while Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that HYBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYBLVCRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

1.01%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

2.80%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62%

3.48%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

4.67%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

4.67%

-0.17%

HYBL vs. VCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBL has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VCRB's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYBL vs. VCRB - Dividend Comparison

HYBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than VCRB's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYBL
State Street Blackstone High Income ETF
7.04%7.22%7.88%7.93%5.10%
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
4.68%4.55%4.22%0.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYBL and VCRB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCRB has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to HYBL (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBL dropped -8.46% vs VCRB's -4.59%.

On 1-year performance, HYBL leads with 5.08% vs 2.64% for VCRB. On fees, VCRB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, HYBL has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYBL has performed better with a 5.08% return vs 2.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCRB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HYBL.

HYBL has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 4.68% for VCRB.

HYBL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while VCRB is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HYBL and 0.10% for VCRB.

HYBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYBL and VCRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer