PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXT.TO vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXT.TO vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HXT.TO is traded in CAD, while FNDF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FNDF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXT.TO achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 19.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HXT.TO having a 12.85% annualized return and FNDF not far behind at 12.81%.


HXT.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.53%
6M
11.58%
1Y
31.00%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
12.85%

FNDF

1D
1.13%
1M
1.62%
YTD
19.48%
6M
21.43%
1Y
42.00%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXT.TO vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
9.53%28.74%20.94%12.02%-6.27%28.11%5.36%22.18%-7.89%9.77%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
19.48%34.56%10.95%17.36%-1.93%14.92%1.16%13.58%-7.00%15.59%

Correlation

The correlation between HXT.TO and FNDF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.63

The correlation between HXT.TO and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXT.TO vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXT.TO
FNDF

Financial Services

37.3%
16.7%

Energy

15.9%
12.3%

Basic Materials

12.6%
11.3%

Technology

12.0%
11.1%

Industrials

8.9%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
6.9%

Utilities

2.9%
3.8%

Communication Services

2.4%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.9%

Healthcare

-

5.5%

Financial Services

HXT.TO
37.3%
FNDF
16.7%

Energy

HXT.TO
15.9%
FNDF
12.3%

Basic Materials

HXT.TO
12.6%
FNDF
11.3%

Technology

HXT.TO
12.0%
FNDF
11.1%

Industrials

HXT.TO
8.9%
FNDF
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HXT.TO
3.9%
FNDF
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

HXT.TO
3.6%
FNDF
6.9%

Utilities

HXT.TO
2.9%
FNDF
3.8%

Communication Services

HXT.TO
2.4%
FNDF
4.9%

Real Estate

HXT.TO
0.5%
FNDF
0.9%

Healthcare

HXT.TO

-

FNDF
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXT.TO vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXT.TO
HXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXT.TO vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXT.TOFNDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.46

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

4.14

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.71

15.95

+2.76

HXT.TO vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXT.TO and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXT.TOFNDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.64

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.93

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.69

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.63

-0.36

Drawdowns

HXT.TO vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -32.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXT.TO and FNDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXT.TOFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.13%

-32.91%

-19.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-10.20%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.36%

-14.33%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.33%

-20.02%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.48%

-32.91%

-2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-3.11%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.09%

-4.58%

-14.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.64%

-0.98%

Volatility

HXT.TO vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) is 3.86%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that HXT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXT.TOFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

6.15%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

13.61%

-4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

16.03%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.79%

17.32%

-4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

18.71%

-3.54%

HXT.TO vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HXT.TO vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.93%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXT.TO and FNDF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

HXT.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HXT.TO and 0.25% for FNDF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXT.TO and FNDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer