PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HXQ.TO vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

HXQ.TO (Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HXQ.TO returned 21.14%/yr vs 19.05%/yr for SCHG. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HXQ.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HXQ.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXQ.TO achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, HXQ.TO has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 21.14%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 19.05% annualized return.

HXQ.TO

1D
0.69%
1M
-5.98%
6M
14.12%
YTD
14.56%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
24.20%
5Y*
16.73%
10Y*
21.14%
ALL TIME*
21.11%

SCHG

1D
0.95%
1M
-1.31%
6M
11.14%
YTD
7.41%
1Y
17.45%
3Y*
23.85%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
19.05%
ALL TIME*
18.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

HXQ.TO

Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF
CA$2.97MCA$3.02MCA$3.91M

SCHG

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
CA$348.51MCA$352.55MCA$472.78M

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXQ.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF		14.56%15.05%35.98%51.16%-27.84%26.20%45.58%32.26%6.71%23.12%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF		7.41%12.14%46.38%46.53%-27.48%28.05%35.84%30.41%6.94%19.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HXQ.TO and SCHG is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016

0.76

The correlation between HXQ.TO and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HXQ.TO
SCHG

Technology

55.9%
44.0%

Communication Services

15.8%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
11.2%

Healthcare

4.4%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
1.9%

Industrials

3.1%
7.6%

Utilities

1.4%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.6%

Energy

0.5%
0.9%

Financial Services

0.3%
7.7%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.6%

Technology

HXQ.TO
55.9%
SCHG
44.0%

Communication Services

HXQ.TO
15.8%
SCHG
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HXQ.TO
13.2%
SCHG
11.2%

Healthcare

HXQ.TO
4.4%
SCHG
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

HXQ.TO
4.4%
SCHG
1.9%

Industrials

HXQ.TO
3.1%
SCHG
7.6%

Utilities

HXQ.TO
1.4%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

HXQ.TO
1.0%
SCHG
1.6%

Energy

HXQ.TO
0.5%
SCHG
0.9%

Financial Services

HXQ.TO
0.3%
SCHG
7.7%

Real Estate

HXQ.TO
0.2%
SCHG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Often compared with HXQ.TO:
HXQ.TO vs. QQC.TOHXQ.TO vs. XQQ.TOHXQ.TO vs. VFV.TOHXQ.TO vs. QQQHXQ.TO vs. HXS.TOHXQ.TO vs. ZNQ.TOHXQ.TO vs. QQC-F.TO
Often compared with SCHG:
SCHG vs. SCHDSCHG vs. QQQMSCHG vs. VOOSCHG vs. VUGSCHG vs. QQQSCHG vs. SPMOSCHG vs. SPYG

Return for Risk

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HXQ.TOSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.25
0.91

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.75
1.34

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.16

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

0.91

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

2.63

+2.86

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXQ.TO and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and SCHG.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HXQ.TOSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-32.68%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-16.70%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-24.01%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.60%

-32.68%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-32.68%

+1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.80%

-2.44%

-5.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-4.77%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

5.74%

-1.44%

Volatility

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.11%. This indicates that HXQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HXQ.TOSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

4.11%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

12.87%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.98%

16.62%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

23.17%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

22.55%

-1.48%

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HXQ.TO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HXQ.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF		0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

HXQ.TO and SCHG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXQ.TO.

HXQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXQ.TO and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer