HWSIX vs. HWGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX).
HWSIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Sep 20, 1985. HWGIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Dec 30, 2012.
Performance
HWSIX vs. HWGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWSIX vs. HWGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 7.19% | 1.60% | 5.00% | 18.85% | 2.97% | 35.54% | -0.31% | 20.54% | -15.03% | 7.66% |
HWGIX Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund | -5.10% | 23.76% | 9.46% | 28.00% | -11.65% | 26.67% | -0.59% | 24.57% | -16.08% | 16.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWSIX achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly higher than HWGIX's -5.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWSIX having a 10.01% annualized return and HWGIX not far behind at 9.88%.
HWSIX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
HWGIX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 10.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWSIX vs. HWGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWSIX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than HWGIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWSIX vs. HWGIX — Risk / Return Rank
HWSIX
HWGIX
HWSIX vs. HWGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWSIX | HWGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.64 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.00 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.14 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.75 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 2.97 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWSIX | HWGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.64 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.48 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.49 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWSIX and HWGIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWSIX vs. HWGIX - Dividend Comparison
HWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than HWGIX's 10.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 0.94% | 1.01% | 8.35% | 1.90% | 13.44% | 0.36% | 0.80% | 4.89% | 9.84% | 5.07% | 0.41% | 11.78% |
HWGIX Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund | 10.15% | 9.63% | 15.10% | 11.01% | 3.92% | 0.68% | 1.49% | 2.56% | 10.34% | 5.50% | 0.80% | 7.06% |
Drawdowns
HWSIX vs. HWGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWSIX drawdown since its inception was -72.00%, which is greater than HWGIX's maximum drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSIX and HWGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWSIX | HWGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.00% | -46.71% | -25.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -12.32% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.92% | -28.63% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.67% | -46.71% | -6.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -9.71% | +6.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -6.75% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 3.12% | +1.30% |
Volatility
HWSIX vs. HWGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) is 4.15%, while Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that HWSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWSIX | HWGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 4.58% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 9.42% | +3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.97% | 16.92% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 17.53% | +4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 20.71% | +3.96% |