HWGIX vs. HWAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund (HWAIX).
HWGIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Dec 30, 2012. HWAIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Dec 31, 2002.
Performance
HWGIX vs. HWAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWGIX vs. HWAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWGIX Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund | -5.10% | 23.76% | 9.46% | 28.00% | -11.65% | 26.67% | -0.59% | 24.57% | -16.08% | 16.73% |
HWAIX Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund | -1.57% | 14.56% | 11.59% | 26.74% | -7.88% | 34.33% | 5.35% | 25.62% | -11.01% | 13.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWGIX achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly lower than HWAIX's -1.57% return. Over the past 10 years, HWGIX has underperformed HWAIX with an annualized return of 9.88%, while HWAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.
HWGIX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 10.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
HWAIX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 10.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWGIX vs. HWAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWGIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HWAIX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWGIX vs. HWAIX — Risk / Return Rank
HWGIX
HWAIX
HWGIX vs. HWAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund (HWAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWGIX | HWAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 0.58 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 0.91 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.66 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 2.84 | +0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWGIX | HWAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 0.58 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.64 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.56 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWGIX and HWAIX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWGIX vs. HWAIX - Dividend Comparison
HWGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.15%, more than HWAIX's 3.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWGIX Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund | 10.15% | 9.63% | 15.10% | 11.01% | 3.92% | 0.68% | 1.49% | 2.56% | 10.34% | 5.50% | 0.80% | 7.06% |
HWAIX Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund | 3.75% | 3.69% | 10.07% | 8.39% | 2.54% | 13.72% | 2.52% | 2.35% | 11.39% | 3.19% | 2.22% | 17.20% |
Drawdowns
HWGIX vs. HWAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWGIX drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, which is greater than HWAIX's maximum drawdown of -41.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWGIX and HWAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWGIX | HWAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.71% | -41.28% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -13.18% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.63% | -23.87% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.71% | -41.28% | -5.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.71% | -5.20% | -4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -5.68% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.07% | +0.05% |
Volatility
HWGIX vs. HWAIX - Volatility Comparison
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund (HWAIX) at 3.38%. This indicates that HWGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWGIX | HWAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.38% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 10.01% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 18.09% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 18.12% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 19.47% | +1.24% |