PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWGIX vs. HWLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWGIX vs. HWLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund (HWLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HWGIX having a 11.62% return and HWLIX slightly higher at 11.63%. Over the past 10 years, HWGIX has underperformed HWLIX with an annualized return of 11.68%, while HWLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.


HWGIX

1D
-0.68%
1M
2.77%
6M
9.32%
YTD
11.62%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.68%
ALL TIME*
10.60%

HWLIX

1D
-1.34%
1M
3.14%
6M
9.75%
YTD
11.63%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
12.27%
ALL TIME*
8.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HWGIX vs. HWLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWGIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund
11.62%23.76%9.46%28.00%-11.65%26.67%-0.59%24.57%-16.08%16.73%
HWLIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund
11.63%18.06%12.80%16.92%-5.31%28.86%-0.29%29.16%-14.26%18.85%

Correlation

The correlation between HWGIX and HWLIX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.95

The correlation between HWGIX and HWLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWGIX vs. HWLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HWGIX
HWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
HWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HWLIX
HWLIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HWLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HWLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HWGIX vs. HWLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund (HWLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWGIXHWLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.95

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

12.25

-4.32

HWGIX vs. HWLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the HWLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWGIX and HWLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWGIX vs. HWLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWGIX drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, smaller than the maximum HWLIX drawdown of -70.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWGIX and HWLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWGIXHWLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.71%

-70.48%

+23.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-6.33%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-16.82%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.63%

-24.69%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.71%

-46.72%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.34%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-10.49%

+3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.04%

+0.82%

Volatility

HWGIX vs. HWLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) is 4.41%, while Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund (HWLIX) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that HWGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWGIXHWLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

4.74%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

9.66%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

13.39%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

18.04%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

21.39%

-1.02%

HWGIX vs. HWLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HWGIX and HWLIX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

HWGIX vs. HWLIX - Dividend Comparison

HWGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.41%, more than HWLIX's 7.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWGIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund
18.41%9.63%15.10%11.01%3.92%0.68%1.49%2.56%10.34%5.50%0.80%7.06%
HWLIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund
7.27%8.12%11.29%11.12%8.48%0.86%1.65%1.62%3.55%1.67%1.94%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, HWGIX and HWLIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HWLIX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to HWGIX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWGIX dropped -46.71% vs HWLIX's -70.48%.

HWLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWGIX and HWLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer