HWMIX vs. NCBVX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HWMIX (Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund) and NCBVX (PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX returned 9.67%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for NCBVX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HWMIX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.95%/yr for NCBVX.

Performance

HWMIX vs. NCBVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly lower than NCBVX's 16.11% return. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX has outperformed NCBVX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while NCBVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.77% annualized return.

HWMIX

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 14.54%
• 6M: 15.37%
• 1Y: 32.28%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 9.52%
• 10Y*: 9.67%

NCBVX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 2.91%
• YTD: 16.11%
• 6M: 16.27%
• 1Y: 31.39%
• 3Y*: 17.63%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: 7.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWMIX vs. NCBVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund	14.54%	7.87%	3.62%	19.87%	1.63%	39.18%	0.49%	12.97%	-19.32%	7.69%
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund	16.11%	11.86%	10.49%	10.40%	-10.18%	33.13%	-7.31%	18.78%	-20.51%	11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between HWMIX and NCBVX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 1998	0.90

The correlation between HWMIX and NCBVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HWMIX vs. NCBVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWMIX

HWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 57
HWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
HWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
HWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
HWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

NCBVX

NCBVX Risk / Return Rank: 76
NCBVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
NCBVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NCBVX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
NCBVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
NCBVX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWMIX vs. NCBVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HWMIX	NCBVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.38	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.39	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.42	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.38	4.89	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	17.74	-5.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HWMIX vs. NCBVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the NCBVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWMIX and NCBVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HWMIX	NCBVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	2.38	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.41	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.34	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.41	+0.07

Drawdowns

HWMIX vs. NCBVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, which is greater than NCBVX's maximum drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and NCBVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HWMIX	NCBVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.84%	-60.64%	-9.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-6.31%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.90%	-21.27%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.90%	-23.15%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.21%	-57.50%	-5.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	0.00%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.83%	-9.10%	-1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	1.74%	+0.80%

Volatility

HWMIX vs. NCBVX - Volatility Comparison

Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HWMIX	NCBVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	3.47%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.84%	9.39%	+1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.27%	13.02%	+3.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.20%	18.81%	+3.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.56%	22.67%	+2.89%

HWMIX vs. NCBVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NCBVX's 1.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

HWMIX vs. NCBVX - Dividend Comparison

HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than NCBVX's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund	1.22%	1.39%	1.15%	0.28%	0.49%	1.28%	2.25%	1.60%	2.99%	6.72%	1.53%	14.67%
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund	0.59%	0.68%	1.03%	1.59%	1.17%	0.74%	1.60%	1.93%	13.70%	6.69%	2.83%	7.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HWMIX and NCBVX in my portfolio?

HWMIX and NCBVX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HWMIX or NCBVX?

HWMIX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to NCBVX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWMIX dropped -69.84% vs NCBVX's -60.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NCBVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.