NCBVX vs. VMFVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NCBVX (PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund) and VMFVX (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NCBVX returned 8.39%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for VMFVX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NCBVX charges 1.95%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VMFVX.

Performance

NCBVX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCBVX achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than VMFVX's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, NCBVX has underperformed VMFVX with an annualized return of 8.39%, while VMFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.

NCBVX

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 18.14%
• 6M: 16.46%
• 1Y: 31.81%
• 3Y*: 17.86%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: 8.39%

VMFVX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 3.28%
• YTD: 11.13%
• 6M: 9.55%
• 1Y: 21.20%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: 11.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCBVX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund	18.14%	11.86%	10.49%	10.40%	-10.18%	33.13%	-7.31%	18.78%	-20.51%	11.63%
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares	11.13%	7.57%	10.59%	16.49%	-7.03%	30.54%	3.68%	26.18%	-11.90%	12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NCBVX and VMFVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.96

The correlation between NCBVX and VMFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NCBVX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCBVX

NCBVX Risk / Return Rank: 85
NCBVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NCBVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
NCBVX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NCBVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
NCBVX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

VMFVX

VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 32
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCBVX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NCBVX	VMFVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	1.47	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	2.21	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.26	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.27	2.13	+3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.01	7.35	+11.66

NCBVX vs. VMFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCBVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the VMFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCBVX and VMFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NCBVX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCBVX drawdown since its inception was -60.64%, which is greater than VMFVX's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCBVX and VMFVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCBVX	VMFVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.64%	-45.79%	-14.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.31%	-10.52%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.27%	-22.46%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.15%	-22.46%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.50%	-45.79%	-11.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.82%	+0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.08%	-5.47%	-3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	3.04%	-1.29%

Volatility

NCBVX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) have volatilities of 4.00% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCBVX	VMFVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	3.88%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.82%	10.67%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.33%	15.28%	-1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.78%	19.42%	-0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.68%	21.89%	+0.79%

NCBVX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCBVX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCBVX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison

NCBVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than VMFVX's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund	0.58%	0.68%	1.03%	1.59%	1.17%	0.74%	1.60%	1.93%	13.70%	6.69%	2.83%	7.89%
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares	1.69%	1.88%	1.81%	1.58%	2.04%	1.81%	2.48%	1.94%	2.01%	1.56%	1.42%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCBVX and VMFVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, NCBVX and VMFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NCBVX or VMFVX?

NCBVX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to VMFVX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCBVX dropped -60.64% vs VMFVX's -45.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NCBVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.