NCBVX vs. MVEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) and Monteagle Select Value Fund (MVEIX).
NCBVX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Aug 19, 1998. MVEIX is managed by Monteagle Funds. It was launched on Mar 30, 1998.
Performance
NCBVX vs. MVEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCBVX achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly higher than MVEIX's 0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, NCBVX has underperformed MVEIX with an annualized return of 7.05%, while MVEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.
NCBVX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 4.82%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
MVEIX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
NCBVX vs. MVEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund | 4.82% | 11.86% | 10.49% | 10.40% | -10.18% | 33.13% | -7.31% | 18.78% | -20.51% | 11.63% |
MVEIX Monteagle Select Value Fund | 0.87% | 14.79% | 7.97% | 6.60% | -11.14% | 40.11% | 4.89% | 28.29% | -16.96% | 11.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCBVX and MVEIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they'll tend to fall together during downturns. For meaningful risk reduction, look for holdings with correlations below 0.5.
NCBVX vs. MVEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCBVX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MVEIX's 1.45% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCBVX vs. MVEIX — Risk / Return Rank
NCBVX
MVEIX
NCBVX vs. MVEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) and Monteagle Select Value Fund (MVEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCBVX | MVEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.88 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 1.38 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.37 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | 5.27 | +2.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCBVX | MVEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.88 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.00 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.01 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.01 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
NCBVX vs. MVEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCBVX drawdown since its inception was -60.64%, smaller than the maximum MVEIX drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCBVX and MVEIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCBVX | MVEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.64% | -97.43% | +36.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -8.33% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.15% | -97.43% | +74.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.50% | -97.43% | +39.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -96.64% | +93.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.15% | -14.82% | +5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.07% | -0.15% |
Volatility
NCBVX vs. MVEIX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Monteagle Select Value Fund (MVEIX) at 3.65%. This indicates that NCBVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCBVX | MVEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 3.65% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 9.23% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 17.49% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 1,966.26% | -1,947.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.67% | 1,390.49% | -1,367.82% |
Dividends
NCBVX vs. MVEIX - Dividend Comparison
NCBVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than MVEIX's 4.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund | 0.65% | 0.68% | 1.03% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 0.74% | 1.60% | 1.93% | 13.70% | 6.69% | 2.83% | 7.89% |
MVEIX Monteagle Select Value Fund | 4.57% | 4.83% | 7.76% | 0.53% | 4.32% | 14.24% | 36.67% | 3.44% | 12.07% | 5.70% | 2.71% | 40.45% |