PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWMIX vs. MVCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HWMIX having a 11.07% return and MVCKX slightly higher at 11.10%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWMIX having a 10.11% annualized return and MVCKX not far behind at 10.06%.


HWMIX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
11.07%
6M
10.34%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
10.11%

MVCKX

1D
0.64%
1M
3.18%
YTD
11.10%
6M
9.87%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWMIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund
11.07%7.87%3.62%19.87%1.63%39.18%0.49%12.97%-19.32%7.69%
MVCKX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6
11.10%6.47%6.80%12.92%-8.62%30.93%4.40%31.11%-11.35%13.83%

Correlation

The correlation between HWMIX and MVCKX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.89

The correlation between HWMIX and MVCKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWMIX vs. MVCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWMIX
HWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

MVCKX
MVCKX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MVCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MVCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWMIXMVCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.17

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

7.44

+1.97

HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the MVCKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWMIX and MVCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, which is greater than MVCKX's maximum drawdown of -42.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and MVCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWMIXMVCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.84%

-42.75%

-27.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-9.36%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.90%

-25.96%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-25.96%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.21%

-42.75%

-20.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

-0.43%

-4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-5.25%

-5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.72%

-0.13%

Volatility

HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Volatility Comparison

Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) at 3.75%. This indicates that HWMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWMIXMVCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

3.75%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

9.90%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

13.62%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.11%

17.53%

+4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.53%

19.42%

+6.11%

HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MVCKX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Dividend Comparison

HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than MVCKX's 7.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWMIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund
1.25%1.39%1.15%0.28%0.49%1.28%2.25%1.60%2.99%6.72%1.53%14.67%
MVCKX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6
7.44%8.27%3.87%3.00%5.44%5.88%1.12%2.32%6.65%3.68%0.06%4.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWMIX and MVCKX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWMIX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to MVCKX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWMIX dropped -69.84% vs MVCKX's -42.75%.

HWMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWMIX and MVCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer