HWMIX vs. MVCKX
HWMIX (Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund) and MVCKX (MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX returned 10.11%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for MVCKX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HWMIX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for MVCKX.
Performance
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HWMIX having a 11.07% return and MVCKX slightly higher at 11.10%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWMIX having a 10.11% annualized return and MVCKX not far behind at 10.06%.
HWMIX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
MVCKX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 11.07% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
MVCKX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 | 11.10% | 6.47% | 6.80% | 12.92% | -8.62% | 30.93% | 4.40% | 31.11% | -11.35% | 13.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWMIX and MVCKX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.89 |
The correlation between HWMIX and MVCKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWMIX vs. MVCKX — Risk / Return Rank
HWMIX
MVCKX
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HWMIX | MVCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 2.17 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | 7.44 | +1.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, which is greater than MVCKX's maximum drawdown of -42.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and MVCKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWMIX | MVCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.84% | -42.75% | -27.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -9.36% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.90% | -25.96% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -25.96% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -42.75% | -20.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.52% | -0.43% | -4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -5.25% | -5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.72% | -0.13% |
Volatility
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Volatility Comparison
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) at 3.75%. This indicates that HWMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWMIX | MVCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 3.75% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 9.90% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 13.62% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 17.53% | +4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.53% | 19.42% | +6.11% |
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MVCKX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Dividend Comparison
HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than MVCKX's 7.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.25% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
MVCKX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 | 7.44% | 8.27% | 3.87% | 3.00% | 5.44% | 5.88% | 1.12% | 2.32% | 6.65% | 3.68% | 0.06% | 4.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HWMIX and MVCKX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HWMIX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to MVCKX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWMIX dropped -69.84% vs MVCKX's -42.75%.
HWMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HWMIX and MVCKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer