HWMIX vs. MVCKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX).
HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997. MVCKX is an actively managed fund by MFS. It was launched on Feb 1, 2013.
Performance
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
MVCKX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 | 1.12% | 6.47% | 6.80% | 12.92% | -8.62% | 30.93% | 4.40% | 31.11% | -11.35% | 13.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than MVCKX's 1.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWMIX having a 9.08% annualized return and MVCKX not far behind at 8.92%.
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
MVCKX
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 10.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MVCKX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWMIX vs. MVCKX — Risk / Return Rank
HWMIX
MVCKX
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWMIX | MVCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.56 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 0.92 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.83 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 3.27 | +2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWMIX | MVCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.56 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.36 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.45 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWMIX and MVCKX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Dividend Comparison
HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than MVCKX's 8.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
MVCKX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 | 8.18% | 8.27% | 3.87% | 3.00% | 5.44% | 5.88% | 1.12% | 2.32% | 6.65% | 3.68% | 0.06% | 4.87% |
Drawdowns
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, which is greater than MVCKX's maximum drawdown of -42.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and MVCKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWMIX | MVCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.84% | -42.75% | -27.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.87% | -13.54% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -25.96% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -42.75% | -20.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -7.30% | +3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -5.30% | -5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 3.43% | +0.72% |
Volatility
HWMIX vs. MVCKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) is 4.30%, while MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that HWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWMIX | MVCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 5.24% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 10.19% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.86% | 18.67% | +5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 17.54% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 19.39% | +6.23% |