PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVCKX vs. FRNKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) and Frank Value Fund (FRNKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVCKX achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than FRNKX's 10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MVCKX has outperformed FRNKX with an annualized return of 9.30%, while FRNKX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.


MVCKX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.32%
YTD
7.87%
6M
8.99%
1Y
17.55%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
9.30%

FRNKX

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
10.39%
6M
10.53%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVCKX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6
7.87%6.47%6.80%12.92%-8.62%30.93%4.40%31.11%-11.35%13.83%
FRNKX
Frank Value Fund
10.39%12.05%19.31%14.88%4.23%6.46%12.84%4.15%-2.24%-2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MVCKX and FRNKX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.70

The correlation between MVCKX and FRNKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (10 years) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVCKX vs. FRNKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVCKX
MVCKX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MVCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MVCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FRNKX
FRNKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FRNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) and Frank Value Fund (FRNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVCKXFRNKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.16

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

1.72

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.46

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.24

6.32

-0.08

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVCKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the FRNKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVCKX and FRNKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVCKXFRNKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.16

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.01

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.01

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.01

+0.47

Drawdowns

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVCKX drawdown since its inception was -42.75%, smaller than the maximum FRNKX drawdown of -97.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVCKX and FRNKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVCKXFRNKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.75%

-97.09%

+54.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-6.95%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.96%

-97.09%

+71.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.96%

-97.09%

+71.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.75%

-97.09%

+54.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-95.86%

+94.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-12.00%

+6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.70%

+0.02%

Volatility

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) is 3.45%, while Frank Value Fund (FRNKX) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that MVCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVCKXFRNKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.97%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

10.57%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

14.93%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.53%

1,805.06%

-1,787.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

1,276.60%

-1,257.20%

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVCKX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FRNKX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Dividend Comparison

MVCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, less than FRNKX's 10.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRNKX
Frank Value Fund
10.85%11.98%4.63%10.14%8.10%4.93%0.00%0.23%3.23%0.00%3.00%7.64%
MVCKX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6
7.67%8.27%3.87%3.00%5.44%5.88%1.12%2.32%6.65%3.68%0.06%4.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVCKX and FRNKX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRNKX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to MVCKX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVCKX dropped -42.75% vs FRNKX's -97.09%.

MVCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVCKX and FRNKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer