PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVCKX vs. FRNKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) and Frank Value Fund (FRNKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVCKX achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly lower than FRNKX's 17.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MVCKX has outperformed FRNKX with an annualized return of 9.80%, while FRNKX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.21% annualized return.


MVCKX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.46%
6M
11.03%
YTD
15.30%
1Y
21.61%
3Y*
10.59%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
9.80%
ALL TIME*
9.31%

FRNKX

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.24%
6M
14.31%
YTD
17.03%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
8.21%
ALL TIME*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVCKX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6
15.30%6.47%6.80%12.92%-8.62%30.93%4.40%31.11%-11.35%13.83%
FRNKX
Frank Value Fund
17.03%12.05%19.31%14.88%4.23%6.46%12.84%4.15%-2.24%-2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MVCKX and FRNKX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.70

The correlation between MVCKX and FRNKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (10 years) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVCKX vs. FRNKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MVCKX
MVCKX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MVCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MVCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FRNKX
FRNKX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FRNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) and Frank Value Fund (FRNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVCKXFRNKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.54

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

6.52

+0.82

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVCKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the FRNKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVCKX and FRNKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVCKX drawdown since its inception was -42.75%, smaller than the maximum FRNKX drawdown of -97.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVCKX and FRNKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVCKXFRNKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.75%

-97.09%

+54.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-6.95%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.96%

-97.09%

+71.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.96%

-97.09%

+71.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.75%

-97.09%

+54.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-95.61%

+94.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-12.62%

+7.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.70%

-0.01%

Volatility

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) is 3.35%, while Frank Value Fund (FRNKX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that MVCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVCKXFRNKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

3.56%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

10.97%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

15.02%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

1,805.77%

-1,788.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

1,276.35%

-1,257.03%

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVCKX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FRNKX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVCKX vs. FRNKX - Dividend Comparison

MVCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, less than FRNKX's 10.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRNKX
Frank Value Fund
10.23%11.98%4.63%10.14%8.10%4.93%0.00%0.23%3.23%0.00%3.00%7.64%
MVCKX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6
7.17%8.27%3.87%3.00%5.44%5.88%1.12%2.32%6.65%3.68%0.06%4.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVCKX and FRNKX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRNKX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to MVCKX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVCKX dropped -42.75% vs FRNKX's -97.09%.

MVCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVCKX and FRNKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer