MVCKX vs. CISMX
MVCKX (MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6) and CISMX (Clarkston Partners Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MVCKX returned 9.80%/yr vs 6.79%/yr for CISMX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MVCKX charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for CISMX.
Performance
MVCKX vs. CISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVCKX achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly higher than CISMX's 9.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MVCKX has outperformed CISMX with an annualized return of 9.80%, while CISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.79% annualized return.
MVCKX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.31%
CISMX
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.64%
- 10Y*
- 6.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MVCKX vs. CISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVCKX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 | 15.30% | 6.47% | 6.80% | 12.92% | -8.62% | 30.93% | 4.40% | 31.11% | -11.35% | 13.83% |
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | 9.60% | -8.37% | 4.49% | 6.41% | -0.40% | 7.94% | 17.42% | 23.98% | -7.25% | 12.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVCKX and CISMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MVCKX and CISMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVCKX vs. CISMX — Risk / Return Rank
MVCKX
CISMX
MVCKX vs. CISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVCKX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 0.93 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 2.02 | +5.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVCKX vs. CISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVCKX drawdown since its inception was -42.75%, which is greater than CISMX's maximum drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVCKX and CISMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVCKX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.75% | -33.80% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -10.54% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.96% | -21.19% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.96% | -21.19% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.75% | -33.80% | -8.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -6.19% | +4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -6.75% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 4.82% | -2.13% |
Volatility
MVCKX vs. CISMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 (MVCKX) is 3.35%, while Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that MVCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVCKX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 8.99% | -5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 15.21% | -5.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.46% | 19.00% | -5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 17.89% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 18.45% | +0.87% |
MVCKX vs. CISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVCKX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than CISMX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVCKX vs. CISMX - Dividend Comparison
MVCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than CISMX's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | 4.25% | 4.65% | 1.05% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 0.81% | 3.73% | 3.79% | 7.15% | 1.30% | 1.17% | 0.09% |
MVCKX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class R6 | 7.17% | 8.27% | 3.87% | 3.00% | 5.44% | 5.88% | 1.12% | 2.32% | 6.65% | 3.68% | 0.06% | 4.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVCKX and CISMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CISMX has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to MVCKX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVCKX dropped -42.75% vs CISMX's -33.80%.
MVCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVCKX and CISMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer