HWMIX vs. CIMDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX).
HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997. CIMDX is managed by Clarkston Funds. It was launched on Jan 31, 2017.
Performance
HWMIX vs. CIMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWMIX vs. CIMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 6.75% |
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund | -4.82% | 7.35% | 5.67% | 10.38% | -3.67% | 6.23% | 23.21% | 23.74% | -7.85% | 11.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than CIMDX's -4.82% return.
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
CIMDX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.41%
- 1Y
- 3.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWMIX vs. CIMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CIMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWMIX vs. CIMDX — Risk / Return Rank
HWMIX
CIMDX
HWMIX vs. CIMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWMIX | CIMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.17 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 0.40 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.05 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.32 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 1.00 | +4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWMIX | CIMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.17 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.12 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.42 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWMIX and CIMDX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWMIX vs. CIMDX - Dividend Comparison
HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than CIMDX's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund | 3.41% | 3.24% | 0.45% | 1.62% | 6.38% | 0.44% | 0.91% | 3.32% | 2.27% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HWMIX vs. CIMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, which is greater than CIMDX's maximum drawdown of -31.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and CIMDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWMIX | CIMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.84% | -31.86% | -37.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.87% | -11.30% | -5.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -21.26% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -8.41% | +5.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -5.88% | -5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 3.60% | +0.55% |
Volatility
HWMIX vs. CIMDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) is 4.30%, while Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that HWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWMIX | CIMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 5.29% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 11.49% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.86% | 18.72% | +5.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 15.81% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 17.52% | +8.10% |