HWGIX vs. MVGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX).
HWGIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Dec 30, 2012. MVGIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Dec 4, 2013.
Performance
HWGIX vs. MVGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWGIX vs. MVGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWGIX Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund | -5.10% | 23.76% | 9.46% | 28.00% | -11.65% | 26.67% | -0.59% | 24.57% | -16.08% | 16.73% |
MVGIX MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund | -1.45% | 16.30% | 12.64% | 13.71% | -8.21% | 16.84% | 5.47% | 20.59% | -2.40% | 18.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWGIX achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly lower than MVGIX's -1.45% return. Over the past 10 years, HWGIX has outperformed MVGIX with an annualized return of 9.88%, while MVGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.97% annualized return.
HWGIX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 10.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
MVGIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -8.44%
- YTD
- -1.45%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 10.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWGIX vs. MVGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWGIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MVGIX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWGIX vs. MVGIX — Risk / Return Rank
HWGIX
MVGIX
HWGIX vs. MVGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWGIX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 1.06 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 1.48 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.22 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 1.20 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 5.19 | -2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWGIX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.06 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.86 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.73 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.72 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWGIX and MVGIX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWGIX vs. MVGIX - Dividend Comparison
HWGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.15%, less than MVGIX's 11.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWGIX Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund | 10.15% | 9.63% | 15.10% | 11.01% | 3.92% | 0.68% | 1.49% | 2.56% | 10.34% | 5.50% | 0.80% | 7.06% |
MVGIX MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund | 11.10% | 10.94% | 7.84% | 1.88% | 3.98% | 9.43% | 1.55% | 2.79% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.94% |
Drawdowns
HWGIX vs. MVGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWGIX drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, which is greater than MVGIX's maximum drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWGIX and MVGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWGIX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.71% | -30.19% | -16.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -8.65% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.63% | -18.01% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.71% | -30.19% | -16.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.71% | -8.44% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -2.89% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 1.99% | +1.13% |
Volatility
HWGIX vs. MVGIX - Volatility Comparison
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX) at 3.22%. This indicates that HWGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWGIX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.22% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 5.74% | +3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 10.51% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 10.51% | +7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 12.38% | +8.33% |