PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWGIX vs. HWSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWGIX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWGIX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 16.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWGIX having a 11.05% annualized return and HWSAX not far behind at 10.63%.


HWGIX

1D
1.32%
1M
4.76%
YTD
7.97%
6M
13.02%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
11.05%

HWSAX

1D
1.15%
1M
1.47%
YTD
16.39%
6M
16.60%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
10.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWGIX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWGIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund
7.97%23.76%9.46%28.00%-11.65%26.67%-0.59%24.57%-16.08%16.73%
HWSAX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A
16.39%1.38%4.77%18.56%2.81%35.32%-0.50%20.26%-15.23%7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between HWGIX and HWSAX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.87

The correlation between HWGIX and HWSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWGIX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWGIX
HWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

HWSAX
HWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWGIX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWGIXHWSAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

1.71

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.49

2.44

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.81

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.48

9.23

-1.75

HWGIX vs. HWSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the HWSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWGIX and HWSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWGIXHWSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.71

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.42

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.43

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.48

+0.06

Drawdowns

HWGIX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWGIX drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWGIX and HWSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWGIXHWSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.71%

-72.14%

+25.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-10.06%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-26.98%

+12.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.63%

-26.98%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.71%

-53.82%

+7.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-10.96%

+4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.06%

-0.14%

Volatility

HWGIX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund (HWGIX) is 2.99%, while Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that HWGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWGIXHWSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.64%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.17%

11.22%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

17.24%

-4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

21.53%

-4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.67%

24.62%

-3.95%

HWGIX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWGIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWGIX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison

HWGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, more than HWSAX's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWGIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund
8.92%9.63%15.10%11.01%3.92%0.68%1.49%2.56%10.34%5.50%0.80%7.06%
HWSAX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A
0.60%0.69%8.19%1.79%13.39%0.22%0.63%4.62%9.45%4.80%0.00%11.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWGIX and HWSAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWSAX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to HWGIX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWGIX dropped -46.71% vs HWSAX's -72.14%.

HWGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWGIX and HWSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer