HWSAX vs. SCYVX
HWSAX (Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A) and SCYVX (AB Small Cap Value Portfolio) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HWSAX returned 10.59%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for SCYVX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HWSAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for SCYVX.
Performance
HWSAX vs. SCYVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWSAX achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly lower than SCYVX's 23.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HWSAX has outperformed SCYVX with an annualized return of 10.59%, while SCYVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.21% annualized return.
HWSAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
SCYVX
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 23.83%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- 32.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
HWSAX vs. SCYVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 15.33% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
SCYVX AB Small Cap Value Portfolio | 23.83% | -0.02% | 11.46% | 7.82% | -16.68% | 35.56% | 3.45% | 25.72% | -16.43% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWSAX and SCYVX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.93 |
The correlation between HWSAX and SCYVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWSAX vs. SCYVX — Risk / Return Rank
HWSAX
SCYVX
HWSAX vs. SCYVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) and AB Small Cap Value Portfolio (SCYVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HWSAX | SCYVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 3.78 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.77 | 11.13 | -3.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HWSAX vs. SCYVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWSAX drawdown since its inception was -72.14%, which is greater than SCYVX's maximum drawdown of -47.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSAX and SCYVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWSAX | SCYVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.14% | -47.74% | -24.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -8.71% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.98% | -27.12% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.98% | -29.12% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.82% | -47.74% | -6.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -0.79% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.94% | -9.42% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.95% | +0.12% |
Volatility
HWSAX vs. SCYVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) is 3.98%, while AB Small Cap Value Portfolio (SCYVX) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that HWSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCYVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWSAX | SCYVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 4.20% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 11.52% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 17.26% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.49% | 21.75% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 23.99% | +0.62% |
HWSAX vs. SCYVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWSAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYVX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Dividends
HWSAX vs. SCYVX - Dividend Comparison
HWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than SCYVX's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.60% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
SCYVX AB Small Cap Value Portfolio | 3.93% | 4.87% | 4.23% | 0.52% | 5.15% | 7.39% | 0.55% | 5.37% | 6.44% | 5.67% | 0.54% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HWSAX and SCYVX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCYVX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to HWSAX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWSAX dropped -72.14% vs SCYVX's -47.74%.
SCYVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HWSAX and SCYVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer