PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HUZ.TO (Global X Silver ETF) and SLVU.TO (BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both Silver funds from Global X - HUZ.TO tracks the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index while SLVU.TO tracks the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HUZ.TO returned 12.04%/yr vs 7.42%/yr for SLVU.TO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HUZ.TO charges 1.18%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for SLVU.TO.

Performance

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUZ.TO achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly higher than SLVU.TO's -32.84% return. Over the past 10 years, HUZ.TO has outperformed SLVU.TO with an annualized return of 12.04%, while SLVU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.42% annualized return.

HUZ.TO

1D
-2.50%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.35%
6M
22.30%
1Y
101.00%
3Y*
40.00%
5Y*
17.25%
10Y*
12.04%

SLVU.TO

1D
-5.36%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
-32.84%
6M
-7.57%
1Y
133.37%
3Y*
49.77%
5Y*
12.11%
10Y*
7.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUZ.TO
Global X Silver ETF		2.35%129.20%18.72%-3.75%1.17%-15.10%39.27%12.48%-11.38%2.96%
SLVU.TO
BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF		-32.84%349.11%20.71%-16.01%-10.21%-34.59%55.46%16.28%-26.54%1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HUZ.TO and SLVU.TO is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009

0.91

The correlation between HUZ.TO and SLVU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HUZ.TO
SLVU.TO

Real Estate

19.0%
26.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

HUZ.TO
19.0%
SLVU.TO
26.4%

Basic Materials

HUZ.TO

-

SLVU.TO

-

Communication Services

HUZ.TO

-

SLVU.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HUZ.TO

-

SLVU.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HUZ.TO

-

SLVU.TO

-

Energy

HUZ.TO

-

SLVU.TO

-

Financial Services

HUZ.TO

-

SLVU.TO

-

Healthcare

HUZ.TO

-

SLVU.TO

-

Industrials

HUZ.TO

-

SLVU.TO

-

Technology

HUZ.TO

-

SLVU.TO

-

Utilities

HUZ.TO

-

SLVU.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Silver ETF

BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF

Often compared with HUZ.TO:
HUZ.TO vs. SVR.TOHUZ.TO vs. HURA.TOHUZ.TO vs. AGCC.TOHUZ.TO vs. SLVOHUZ.TO vs. GLCL.TOHUZ.TO vs. MNS.TOHUZ.TO vs. XGD.TO
Often compared with SLVU.TO:
SLVU.TO vs. GDXUSLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TOSLVU.TO vs. LGD.TOSLVU.TO vs. HXD.TOSLVU.TO vs. CPXRSLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TOSLVU.TO vs. MNS.TO

Return for Risk

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HUZ.TO
HUZ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HUZ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUZ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUZ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HUZ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUZ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO
SLVU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SLVU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HUZ.TOSLVU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.72
1.14

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.95
1.87

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.75

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

3.33

+1.74

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUZ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the SLVU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUZ.TO and SLVU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HUZ.TOSLVU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.14

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.17

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.11

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.01

+0.22

Drawdowns

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.06%, smaller than the maximum SLVU.TO drawdown of -98.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUZ.TO and SLVU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HUZ.TOSLVU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.06%

-98.60%

+17.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.11%

-76.62%

+33.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.11%

-76.62%

+33.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.11%

-76.62%

+33.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.84%

-80.27%

+31.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.13%

-90.63%

+52.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.91%

-82.56%

+27.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.99%

40.19%

-20.20%

Volatility

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) is 16.29%, while BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) has a volatility of 34.08%. This indicates that HUZ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HUZ.TOSLVU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.29%

34.08%

-17.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.22%

132.13%

-73.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.94%

118.13%

-59.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.28%

73.80%

-36.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.24%

65.52%

-32.28%

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUZ.TO has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVU.TO's 2.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUZ.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HUZ.TO nor SLVU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 1.00, HUZ.TO and SLVU.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HUZ.TO is cheaper at 1.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUZ.TO is cheaper with a 1.18% expense ratio, compared with 2.20% for SLVU.TO.

HUZ.TO tracks Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index, while SLVU.TO tracks Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER. Their fees differ too: 1.18% for HUZ.TO and 2.20% for SLVU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUZ.TO and SLVU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer