HUZ.TO vs. SLVO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and Credit Suisse X-Links Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO).
HUZ.TO and SLVO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUZ.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2009. SLVO is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. It was launched on Apr 17, 2013. Both HUZ.TO and SLVO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HUZ.TO vs. SLVO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUZ.TO vs. SLVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HUZ.TO Global X Silver ETF | 5.82% | 129.20% | -7.04% |
SLVO Credit Suisse X-Links Silver Shares Covered Call ETN | 8.37% | 63.34% | 6.84% |
Different Trading Currencies
HUZ.TO is traded in CAD, while SLVO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUZ.TO achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly lower than SLVO's 8.37% return.
HUZ.TO
- 1D
- 7.32%
- 1M
- -20.09%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 57.40%
- 1Y
- 105.90%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 20.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
SLVO
- 1D
- 6.21%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- 8.37%
- 6M
- 24.07%
- 1Y
- 51.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUZ.TO vs. SLVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUZ.TO has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HUZ.TO vs. SLVO — Risk / Return Rank
HUZ.TO
SLVO
HUZ.TO vs. SLVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) and Credit Suisse X-Links Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUZ.TO | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.79 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.10 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 3.28 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | 11.87 | -4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUZ.TO | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.79 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 1.72 | -1.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUZ.TO and SLVO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HUZ.TO vs. SLVO - Dividend Comparison
HUZ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.16%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HUZ.TO Global X Silver ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVO Credit Suisse X-Links Silver Shares Covered Call ETN | 38.16% | 19.35% | 14.45% |
Drawdowns
HUZ.TO vs. SLVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.06%, which is greater than SLVO's maximum drawdown of -15.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUZ.TO and SLVO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUZ.TO | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.06% | -17.23% | -63.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.11% | -17.23% | -25.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.03% | -8.42% | -27.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.11% | -2.99% | -52.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.90% | 3.93% | +9.97% |
Volatility
HUZ.TO vs. SLVO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Silver ETF (HUZ.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.07% compared to Credit Suisse X-Links Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) at 14.63%. This indicates that HUZ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUZ.TO | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.07% | 14.63% | +4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.44% | 26.53% | +30.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.58% | 28.67% | +28.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.48% | 24.46% | +12.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.76% | 24.46% | +8.30% |