HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HUTL.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF) and QQQY.TO (Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HUTL.TO is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Harvest, while QQQY.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index. HUTL.TO is actively managed, while QQQY.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, HUTL.TO returned 16.39% vs 52.29% for QQQY.TO. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. HUTL.TO charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for QQQY.TO.

Performance

HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTL.TO achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY.TO's 20.66% return.

HUTL.TO

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 10.20%
• 6M: 10.63%
• 1Y: 16.39%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

QQQY.TO

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 12.57%
• YTD: 20.66%
• 6M: 19.40%
• 1Y: 52.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	10.20%	15.59%	14.70%	10.09%
QQQY.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund	20.66%	24.48%	28.32%	28,271.93%

Correlation

The correlation between HUTL.TO and QQQY.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023	-0.11

HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUTL.TO	QQQY.TO
Utilities	40.4%	-
Communication Services	38.2%	19.7%
Energy	18.1%	-
Industrials	3.3%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	79.0%

Return for Risk

HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTL.TO

HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 58
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 64

QQQY.TO

QQQY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QQQY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QQQY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QQQY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HUTL.TO	QQQY.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	2.81	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	3.53	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.48	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.54	3.52	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.50	13.82	-2.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTL.TO and QQQY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUTL.TO	QQQY.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	2.81	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.07	+0.42

Drawdowns

HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, which is greater than QQQY.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and QQQY.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUTL.TO	QQQY.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.00%	-26.27%	-7.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.62%	-14.91%	+11.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.10%	-0.14%	-2.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.68%	-4.03%	-2.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.43%	3.79%	-2.36%

Volatility

HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) is 4.16%, while Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that HUTL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUTL.TO	QQQY.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	4.62%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	14.65%	-6.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.23%	18.74%	-8.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.00%	15,024.21%	-15,011.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.25%	15,024.21%	-15,008.96%

HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY.TO's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUTL.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, less than QQQY.TO's 12.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	7.66%	7.94%	8.30%	8.56%	8.13%	7.16%	7.73%	5.33%
QQQY.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund	12.29%	13.97%	14.09%	2.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUTL.TO and QQQY.TO in my portfolio?

HUTL.TO and QQQY.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUTL.TO or QQQY.TO?

On fees, HUTL.TO is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUTL.TO or QQQY.TO?

HUTL.TO is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for QQQY.TO.

What is the main difference between HUTL.TO and QQQY.TO?

HUTL.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while QQQY.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for HUTL.TO and 0.74% for QQQY.TO.