PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY.TO vs. QQCL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQY.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQY.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QQQY.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund
-9.65%27.46%207.55%52.28%
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
-4.67%13.10%41.38%5.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY.TO achieves a -9.65% return, which is significantly lower than QQCL.TO's -4.67% return.


QQQY.TO

1D
3.10%
1M
-6.15%
YTD
-9.65%
6M
-5.13%
1Y
27.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQCL.TO

1D
2.65%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
-4.67%
6M
-2.53%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQY.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.TO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than QQCL.TO's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQY.TO vs. QQCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY.TO
QQQY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

QQCL.TO
QQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQY.TOQQCL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.74

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

1.18

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.15

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.67

4.61

+2.06

QQQY.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY.TO and QQCL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQY.TOQQCL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.74

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

1.03

-0.97

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.TO and QQCL.TO is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQY.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.52%, which matches QQCL.TO's 14.48% yield.


TTM202520242023
QQQY.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund
14.52%16.21%96.39%27.84%
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
14.48%14.54%11.87%3.68%

Drawdowns

QQQY.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, roughly equal to the maximum QQCL.TO drawdown of -25.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.TO and QQCL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQY.TOQQCL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.27%

-25.63%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-16.21%

+1.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.27%

-8.32%

-3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-3.48%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

4.04%

0.00%

Volatility

QQQY.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) at 6.86%. This indicates that QQQY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQY.TOQQCL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

6.86%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.39%

12.95%

+2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.30%

24.34%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46,687.01%

20.61%

+46,666.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46,687.01%

20.61%

+46,666.40%