HUSV vs. EELV
HUSV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF) and EELV (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. HUSV is actively managed, while EELV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HUSV returned 5.52%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for EELV. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUSV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EELV.
Performance
HUSV vs. EELV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUSV achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than EELV's 3.97% return.
HUSV
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- -1.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- —
EELV
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- 1Y
- 14.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 6.56%
HUSV vs. EELV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUSV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF | 0.86% | 4.96% | 12.64% | 3.51% | -6.31% | 26.04% | 5.39% | 26.98% | -1.92% | 16.07% |
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.97% | 21.97% | 1.90% | 8.85% | -3.98% | 16.15% | -3.89% | 8.89% | -5.40% | 24.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUSV and EELV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2016 | 0.44 |
The correlation between HUSV and EELV shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HUSV vs. EELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HUSV
EELV
Technology
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
HUSV
EELV
Financial Services
HUSV
EELV
Utilities
HUSV
EELV
Industrials
HUSV
EELV
Real Estate
HUSV
EELV
Consumer Cyclical
HUSV
EELV
Healthcare
HUSV
EELV
Consumer Defensive
HUSV
EELV
Basic Materials
HUSV
EELV
Energy
HUSV
EELV
Communication Services
HUSV
EELV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUSV vs. EELV — Risk / Return Rank
HUSV
EELV
HUSV vs. EELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUSV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.24 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 1.77 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 5.99 | -6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUSV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 1.34 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.60 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.30 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
HUSV vs. EELV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUSV drawdown since its inception was -35.72%, roughly equal to the maximum EELV drawdown of -36.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUSV and EELV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUSV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.72% | -36.35% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -8.22% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.35% | -11.79% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.00% | -19.04% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.95% | -4.71% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -8.93% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.42% | +0.38% |
Volatility
HUSV vs. EELV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is 2.36%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that HUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUSV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 3.40% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.30% | 9.03% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.07% | 10.87% | -1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.02% | 11.36% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 13.64% | +0.85% |
HUSV vs. EELV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUSV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EELV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUSV vs. EELV - Dividend Comparison
HUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than EELV's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.60% | 3.75% | 4.70% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 4.35% | 2.82% | 3.14% | 5.50% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.53% |
HUSV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.14% | 1.80% | 1.68% | 1.35% | 1.29% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 1.31% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUSV and EELV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EELV has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to HUSV (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUSV dropped -35.72% vs EELV's -36.35%.
On 5-year performance, EELV leads with 6.82% vs 5.52% for HUSV. On fees, EELV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EELV has performed better with a 6.82% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EELV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HUSV.
EELV has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.37% for HUSV.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HUSV and 0.30% for EELV.
EELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUSV and EELV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer