PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUSV vs. BDGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HUSV vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HUSV vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HUSV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
-0.31%4.96%12.64%4.18%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
-0.87%10.61%19.07%8.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUSV achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's -0.87% return.


HUSV

1D
0.28%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-0.31%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-2.83%
3Y*
7.48%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*

BDGS

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
0.57%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HUSV vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUSV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HUSV vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUSV
HUSV Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
HUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUSV vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUSVBDGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

1.02

-1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.23

1.72

-1.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.29

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

1.90

-2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.07

9.84

-10.92

HUSV vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUSV Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUSV and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUSVBDGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

1.02

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.54

-0.94

Correlation

The correlation between HUSV and BDGS is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HUSV vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

HUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HUSV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
1.39%1.38%1.14%1.80%1.68%1.35%1.29%1.36%1.48%1.31%0.35%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.56%0.55%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HUSV vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUSV drawdown since its inception was -35.72%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUSV and BDGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HUSVBDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.72%

-9.12%

-26.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-5.85%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-1.61%

-3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-0.67%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.13%

+1.66%

Volatility

HUSV vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is 3.04%, while Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that HUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HUSVBDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

3.45%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.62%

5.12%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

10.72%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.04%

8.35%

+3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

8.35%

+6.22%