HUMN vs. CHPS

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. HUMN is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Over the past year, HUMN returned 19.31% vs 134.16% for CHPS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

HUMN vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 75.71% return.

HUMN

• 1D: -3.28%
• 1M: -15.23%
• 6M: -5.67%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: -15.00%
• 6M: 53.49%
• YTD: 75.71%
• 1Y: 134.16%
• 3Y*: 48.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.87%	20.70%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	75.71%	37.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and CHPS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.74

The correlation between HUMN and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

HUMN vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUMN	CHPS
Industrials	38.4%	0.4%
Technology	26.6%	99.6%
Consumer Cyclical	17.4%	0.0%
Financial Services	3.6%	0.2%
Basic Materials	3.5%	-
Communication Services	2.1%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMN

HUMN Risk / Return Rank: 22
HUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
HUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
HUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 25

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 93
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUMN	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	3.12	-2.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	3.28	-2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.44	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	5.91	-5.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.50	22.47	-19.97

HUMN vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUMN and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.61%	-39.44%	+16.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.61%	-22.83%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.61%	-22.83%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.33%	-9.17%	+3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.74%	5.99%	+1.75%

Volatility

HUMN vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) is 15.86%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 21.43%. This indicates that HUMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.86%	21.43%	-5.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.96%	38.15%	-9.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.09%	43.28%	-9.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.38%	36.55%	-3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.38%	36.55%	-3.17%

HUMN vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than CHPS's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.37%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.72%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and CHPS in my portfolio?

HUMN and CHPS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HUMN or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (21.43%) compared to HUMN (15.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUMN dropped -22.61% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 134.16% vs 19.31% for HUMN. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HUMN has been the lower-risk option at 15.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HUMN or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 134.16% return vs 19.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or CHPS?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.37% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between HUMN and CHPS?

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.