ENSG vs. MNST

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ENSG (The Ensign Group, Inc.) and MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) are both stocks. ENSG operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while MNST operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ENSG returned 24.84%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for MNST. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ENSG vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENSG achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 16.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ENSG has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 24.84%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 13.33% annualized return.

ENSG

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -8.43%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: -6.81%
• 1Y: 10.82%
• 3Y*: 22.31%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 24.84%

MNST

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 18.40%
• YTD: 16.13%
• 6M: 20.35%
• 1Y: 39.15%
• 3Y*: 14.39%
• 5Y*: 13.30%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENSG vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENSG The Ensign Group, Inc.	-4.29%	31.33%	18.62%	18.89%	12.98%	15.43%	61.43%	25.53%	75.67%	0.78%
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation	16.13%	45.87%	-8.77%	13.48%	5.72%	3.85%	45.52%	29.11%	-22.23%	42.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ENSG and MNST is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2007	0.25

The correlation between ENSG and MNST shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ENSG : $9.93B MNST : $87.99B
EPS ENSG : $6.15 MNST : $2.06
PE Ratio ENSG : 27.11 MNST : 43.21
PEG Ratio ENSG : 1.79 MNST : 3.38
PS Ratio ENSG : 1.87 MNST : 9.98
PB Ratio ENSG : 4.20 MNST : 10.08
Total Revenue (TTM) ENSG : $5.27B MNST : $8.79B
Gross Profit (TTM) ENSG : $800.38M MNST : $4.88B
EBITDA (TTM) ENSG : $590.49M MNST : $2.70B

Return for Risk

ENSG vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENSG

ENSG Risk / Return Rank: 52
ENSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ENSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ENSG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ENSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ENSG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

MNST

MNST Risk / Return Rank: 79
MNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MNST Omega Ratio Rank: 79
MNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MNST Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENSG vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENSG	MNST	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.49	-1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	2.36	-1.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.30	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	2.22	-1.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.37	6.31	-4.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENSG vs. MNST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENSG Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENSG and MNST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENSG	MNST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	1.49	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.54	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.51	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.60	-0.02

Drawdowns

ENSG vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENSG drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, smaller than the maximum MNST drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENSG and MNST.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENSG	MNST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.57%	-69.17%	+13.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.53%	-17.70%	-5.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.53%	-26.04%	+2.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.59%	-26.62%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.57%	-30.42%	-25.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.75%	-0.22%	-22.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.24%	-20.68%	+8.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.93%	6.25%	+1.68%

Volatility

ENSG vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) is 7.53%, while Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) has a volatility of 13.66%. This indicates that ENSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENSG	MNST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.53%	13.66%	-6.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.23%	19.99%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.47%	26.34%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.37%	24.59%	+1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.99%	26.25%	+9.74%

Dividends

ENSG vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

ENSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENSG The Ensign Group, Inc.	0.15%	0.14%	0.18%	0.21%	0.24%	0.25%	0.28%	0.40%	0.47%	0.78%	0.73%	0.67%
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

ENSG vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Ensign Group, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ENSG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 293.37M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.

MNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

ENSG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 124.85M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

MNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

ENSG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported a net income of 99.67M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

MNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENSG and MNST in my portfolio?

ENSG and MNST have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ENSG or MNST?

MNST has higher volatility (13.66%) compared to ENSG (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENSG dropped -55.57% vs MNST's -69.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.