PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HUM vs. MNST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HUMMNST
YTD Return-33.85%-7.22%
1Y Return-43.08%-5.96%
3Y Return (Ann)-11.52%3.28%
5Y Return (Ann)4.84%13.05%
10Y Return (Ann)11.55%17.00%
Sharpe Ratio-1.33-0.22
Daily Std Dev32.03%21.18%
Max Drawdown-85.10%-96.53%
Current Drawdown-45.71%-12.16%

Fundamentals


HUMMNST
Market Cap$36.86B$55.89B
EPS$16.24$1.54
PE Ratio18.8434.66
PEG Ratio1.641.88
Revenue (TTM)$109.24B$7.14B
Gross Profit (TTM)$17.18B$3.17B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.47B$2.08B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between HUM and MNST is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

HUM vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HUM achieves a -33.85% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's -7.22% return. Over the past 10 years, HUM has underperformed MNST with an annualized return of 11.55%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively higher 17.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


10,000.00%20,000.00%30,000.00%40,000.00%50,000.00%60,000.00%70,000.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
12,432.25%
65,242.30%
HUM
MNST

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Humana Inc.

Monster Beverage Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HUM vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Humana Inc. (HUM) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HUM, currently valued at -1.33, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-1.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HUM, currently valued at -1.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HUM, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.72
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HUM, currently valued at -0.93, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.93
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HUM, currently valued at -2.05, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-2.05
MNST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.21, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MNST, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.98
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MNST, currently valued at -0.59, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.59

HUM vs. MNST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUM Sharpe Ratio is -1.33, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of HUM and MNST.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-1.33
-0.22
HUM
MNST

Dividends

HUM vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

HUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
HUM
Humana Inc.
1.17%0.77%0.62%0.60%0.61%0.60%0.70%0.76%0.43%0.64%0.77%1.04%
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HUM vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUM drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, smaller than the maximum MNST drawdown of -96.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUM and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-45.71%
-12.16%
HUM
MNST

Volatility

HUM vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

Humana Inc. (HUM) has a higher volatility of 15.58% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 4.96%. This indicates that HUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
15.58%
4.96%
HUM
MNST

Financials

HUM vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Humana Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items