PortfoliosLab logo
HUM vs. MNST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HUM and MNST is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HUM vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Humana Inc. (HUM) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100,000.00%200,000.00%300,000.00%400,000.00%500,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,403.51%
484,900.00%
HUM
MNST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HUM:

-0.50

MNST:

0.43

Sortino Ratio

HUM:

-0.42

MNST:

0.72

Omega Ratio

HUM:

0.94

MNST:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

HUM:

-0.34

MNST:

0.42

Martin Ratio

HUM:

-0.74

MNST:

1.28

Ulcer Index

HUM:

26.73%

MNST:

8.54%

Daily Std Dev

HUM:

41.66%

MNST:

25.33%

Max Drawdown

HUM:

-85.10%

MNST:

-69.17%

Current Drawdown

HUM:

-53.92%

MNST:

-1.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUM:

$31.20B

MNST:

$59.28B

EPS

HUM:

$14.16

MNST:

$1.49

PE Ratio

HUM:

18.25

MNST:

40.88

PEG Ratio

HUM:

0.79

MNST:

2.14

PS Ratio

HUM:

0.26

MNST:

7.91

PB Ratio

HUM:

1.76

MNST:

9.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUM:

$120.26B

MNST:

$5.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUM:

$120.26B

MNST:

$3.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

HUM:

$4.12B

MNST:

$1.46B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUM achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 14.42% return. Over the past 10 years, HUM has underperformed MNST with an annualized return of 5.07%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively higher 10.44% annualized return.


HUM

YTD

0.19%

1M

-10.14%

6M

-11.36%

1Y

-20.90%

5Y*

-6.95%

10Y*

5.07%

MNST

YTD

14.42%

1M

9.33%

6M

9.88%

1Y

10.76%

5Y*

12.87%

10Y*

10.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HUM vs. MNST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HUM is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HUM is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HUM is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HUM is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HUM is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HUM is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MNST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNST is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNST is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNST is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNST is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNST is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNST is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HUM vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Humana Inc. (HUM) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HUM Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUM and MNST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.50
0.43
HUM
MNST

Dividends

HUM vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

HUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HUM
Humana Inc.
1.40%1.40%0.77%0.62%0.60%0.61%0.60%0.70%0.76%0.43%0.64%0.77%
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HUM vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUM drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUM and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-53.92%
-1.26%
HUM
MNST

Volatility

HUM vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

Humana Inc. (HUM) has a higher volatility of 13.57% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 7.23%. This indicates that HUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.57%
7.23%
HUM
MNST

Financials

HUM vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Humana Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20212022202320242025
32.11B
1.81B
(HUM) Total Revenue
(MNST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HUM vs. MNST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Humana Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
55.3%
(HUM) Gross Margin
(MNST) Gross Margin
HUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Humana Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.11B and revenue of 32.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

MNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.00B and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

HUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Humana Inc. reported an operating income of 2.01B and revenue of 32.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

MNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 381.22M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

HUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Humana Inc. reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 32.11B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

MNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 270.71M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.