PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HULIX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HULIX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HULIX achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than FBLEX's 8.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HULIX having a 12.32% annualized return and FBLEX not far behind at 11.85%.


HULIX

1D
0.59%
1M
1.44%
YTD
5.58%
6M
7.89%
1Y
16.46%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
12.32%

FBLEX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.06%
YTD
8.01%
6M
10.46%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HULIX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HULIX
Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund
5.58%8.99%15.96%19.96%-3.55%32.72%3.47%34.12%-13.79%19.54%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
8.01%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HULIX and FBLEX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2012

0.90

The correlation between HULIX and FBLEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HULIX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HULIX
HULIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HULIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HULIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HULIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HULIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HULIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HULIX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HULIXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

2.17

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

3.12

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.30

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

13.39

-6.69

HULIX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HULIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HULIX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HULIXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.17

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.78

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.68

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.73

-0.35

Drawdowns

HULIX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HULIX drawdown since its inception was -70.36%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HULIX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HULIXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.36%

-39.73%

-30.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

-6.89%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.14%

-14.71%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-19.00%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-39.73%

+4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.52%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-3.83%

-6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.70%

+0.80%

Volatility

HULIX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) at 2.74%. This indicates that HULIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HULIXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.74%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

7.90%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

10.51%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

14.79%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

17.40%

+1.17%

HULIX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HULIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

HULIX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

HULIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than FBLEX's 10.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.28%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%
HULIX
Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund
1.11%1.17%0.93%0.74%0.65%0.30%1.72%0.73%1.37%0.64%1.26%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HULIX and FBLEX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HULIX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FBLEX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HULIX dropped -70.36% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

FBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HULIX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer