PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HULIX vs. HUMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HULIX vs. HUMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX) and Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HULIX achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than HUMDX's 10.58% return. Over the past 10 years, HULIX has outperformed HUMDX with an annualized return of 12.32%, while HUMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.


HULIX

1D
0.59%
1M
1.44%
YTD
5.58%
6M
7.89%
1Y
16.46%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
12.32%

HUMDX

1D
0.72%
1M
0.51%
YTD
10.58%
6M
17.26%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HULIX vs. HUMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HULIX
Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund
5.58%8.99%15.96%19.96%-3.55%32.72%3.47%34.12%-13.79%19.54%
HUMDX
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund
10.58%7.65%13.40%10.56%-7.13%26.51%-8.19%25.70%-18.40%15.04%

Correlation

The correlation between HULIX and HUMDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.86

The correlation between HULIX and HUMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HULIX vs. HUMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HULIX
HULIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HULIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HULIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HULIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HULIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HULIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

HUMDX
HUMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HUMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HUMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HULIX vs. HUMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX) and Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HULIXHUMDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

1.97

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

2.75

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.80

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

9.72

-3.02

HULIX vs. HUMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HULIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the HUMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HULIX and HUMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HULIXHUMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.97

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.28

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.35

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.34

+0.03

Drawdowns

HULIX vs. HUMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HULIX drawdown since its inception was -70.36%, which is greater than HUMDX's maximum drawdown of -50.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HULIX and HUMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HULIXHUMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.36%

-50.39%

-19.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

-10.87%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.14%

-25.16%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-25.16%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-50.39%

+14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-8.89%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

3.13%

-0.63%

Volatility

HULIX vs. HUMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX) is 2.91%, while Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that HULIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HULIXHUMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

3.58%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

11.45%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

15.76%

-4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

20.47%

-4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

22.53%

-3.96%

HULIX vs. HUMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HULIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HUMDX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HULIX vs. HUMDX - Dividend Comparison

HULIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than HUMDX's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HULIX
Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund
1.11%1.17%0.93%0.74%0.65%0.30%1.72%0.73%1.37%0.64%1.26%1.00%
HUMDX
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund
0.69%0.76%1.02%1.14%2.01%0.95%0.66%0.00%1.16%0.61%2.34%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HULIX and HUMDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUMDX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to HULIX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HULIX dropped -70.36% vs HUMDX's -50.39%.

HUMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HULIX and HUMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer