PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HULIX vs. LEXCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HULIX vs. LEXCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HULIX achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly lower than LEXCX's 15.98% return. Over the past 10 years, HULIX has outperformed LEXCX with an annualized return of 12.69%, while LEXCX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.73% annualized return.


HULIX

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.14%
YTD
3.46%
6M
2.82%
1Y
11.66%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
12.69%

LEXCX

1D
0.86%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
15.98%
6M
15.38%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HULIX vs. LEXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HULIX
Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund
3.46%8.99%15.96%19.96%-3.55%32.72%3.47%34.12%-13.79%19.54%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
15.98%7.04%3.60%14.53%3.95%26.77%4.36%21.43%-5.44%16.61%

Correlation

The correlation between HULIX and LEXCX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between HULIX and LEXCX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HULIX vs. LEXCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HULIX
HULIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HULIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HULIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HULIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HULIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HULIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

LEXCX
LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HULIX vs. LEXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HULIXLEXCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

3.36

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

8.21

-3.34

HULIX vs. LEXCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HULIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the LEXCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HULIX and LEXCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HULIX vs. LEXCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HULIX drawdown since its inception was -70.36%, which is greater than LEXCX's maximum drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HULIX and LEXCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HULIXLEXCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.36%

-50.42%

-19.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

-6.22%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.14%

-14.03%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-19.75%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-39.21%

+3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-4.80%

+2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-7.11%

-3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.50%

+0.01%

Volatility

HULIX vs. LEXCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX) is 3.60%, while Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that HULIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HULIXLEXCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.61%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

10.95%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

14.09%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

16.52%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.56%

19.02%

-0.46%

HULIX vs. LEXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HULIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than LEXCX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

HULIX vs. LEXCX - Dividend Comparison

HULIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than LEXCX's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HULIX
Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund
1.13%1.17%0.93%0.74%0.65%0.30%1.72%0.73%1.37%0.64%1.26%1.00%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
1.42%1.65%1.66%1.58%1.65%1.54%1.91%1.86%2.03%1.79%3.93%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


HULIX and LEXCX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEXCX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to HULIX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HULIX dropped -70.36% vs LEXCX's -50.42%.

LEXCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HULIX and LEXCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer