PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBLEX vs. DRIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBLEX vs. DRIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) and The MP 63 Fund (DRIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBLEX achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than DRIPX's 11.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FBLEX has outperformed DRIPX with an annualized return of 12.15%, while DRIPX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


FBLEX

1D
0.39%
1M
2.10%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.82%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
12.15%

DRIPX

1D
0.74%
1M
0.90%
YTD
11.92%
6M
11.12%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBLEX vs. DRIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.35%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%
DRIPX
The MP 63 Fund
11.92%13.89%4.75%5.93%-8.37%20.46%8.13%28.65%-5.55%18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FBLEX and DRIPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012

0.93

The correlation between FBLEX and DRIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBLEX vs. DRIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIPX
DRIPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DRIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBLEX vs. DRIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) and The MP 63 Fund (DRIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBLEXDRIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

3.20

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.83

12.54

+2.29

FBLEX vs. DRIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBLEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the DRIPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBLEX and DRIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBLEX vs. DRIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBLEX drawdown since its inception was -39.73%, smaller than the maximum DRIPX drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBLEX and DRIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBLEXDRIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.73%

-53.54%

+13.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-7.70%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-19.58%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.00%

-19.97%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.73%

-35.20%

-4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.49%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-6.57%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.96%

-0.26%

Volatility

FBLEX vs. DRIPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) and The MP 63 Fund (DRIPX) have volatilities of 3.41% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBLEXDRIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

3.55%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

8.51%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

10.79%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

14.21%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

16.46%

+0.95%

FBLEX vs. DRIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBLEX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIPX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBLEX vs. DRIPX - Dividend Comparison

FBLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.06%, more than DRIPX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIPX
The MP 63 Fund
6.29%7.04%0.00%3.13%4.27%3.55%3.48%3.46%6.25%1.68%4.27%6.80%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.06%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FBLEX and DRIPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRIPX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to FBLEX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBLEX dropped -39.73% vs DRIPX's -53.54%.

FBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBLEX and DRIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer