HTUS vs. WTIP
HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) and WTIP (WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTUS charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for WTIP.
Performance
HTUS vs. WTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly lower than WTIP's 15.11% return.
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
WTIP
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 17.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS vs. WTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 11.33% | 15.00% |
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund | 15.11% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and WTIP is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTUS vs. WTIP — Risk / Return Rank
HTUS
WTIP
HTUS vs. WTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTUS | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.71 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTUS | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.95 | -1.37 |
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. WTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, which is greater than WTIP's maximum drawdown of -7.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and WTIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTUS | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -7.74% | -39.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -7.73% | +7.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -1.36% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | — | — |
Volatility
HTUS vs. WTIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTUS | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 17.07% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 17.07% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 17.07% | +4.38% |
HTUS vs. WTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTUS vs. WTIP - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than WTIP's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.68% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund | 2.78% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTUS and WTIP have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTIP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTIP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 2.78% for WTIP.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 0.65% for WTIP.
Find the right allocation for HTUS and WTIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer