HTUS vs. URNM
Compare and contrast key facts about Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM).
HTUS and URNM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HTUS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Jun 25, 2015. URNM is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019.
Performance
HTUS vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HTUS vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | -3.85% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 1.76% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 15.05% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 68.36% | 3.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's 15.05% return.
HTUS
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- -3.85%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 17.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
URNM
- 1D
- 8.06%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 101.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HTUS vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HTUS vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank
HTUS
URNM
HTUS vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTUS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.98 | -1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 2.57 | -1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 3.28 | -2.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 9.12 | -2.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTUS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.98 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.42 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.71 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and URNM is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HTUS vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.37%, more than URNM's 2.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 12.37% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and URNM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTUS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -50.78% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.90% | -30.79% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | -50.78% | +26.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -24.81% | +19.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -17.89% | +13.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 11.08% | -8.47% |
Volatility
HTUS vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is 6.36%, while NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 18.90%. This indicates that HTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HTUS | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 18.90% | -12.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 40.47% | -31.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.90% | 51.55% | -29.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 48.02% | -29.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 46.76% | -25.38% |