HTUS vs. NETL
HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) and NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while NETL is a REIT fund tracking the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. HTUS is actively managed, while NETL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTUS returned 15.35%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for NETL. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTUS charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NETL.
Performance
HTUS vs. NETL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly higher than NETL's 10.34% return.
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
NETL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 11.33% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 11.29% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 10.34% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and NETL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HTUS and NETL has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HTUS vs. NETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HTUS
NETL
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
HTUS
NETL
-
Financial Services
HTUS
NETL
-
Communication Services
HTUS
NETL
-
Consumer Cyclical
HTUS
NETL
-
Healthcare
HTUS
NETL
-
Industrials
HTUS
NETL
-
Consumer Defensive
HTUS
NETL
-
Energy
HTUS
NETL
-
Utilities
HTUS
NETL
-
Real Estate
HTUS
NETL
Basic Materials
HTUS
NETL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTUS vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank
HTUS
NETL
HTUS vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTUS | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 0.86 | +1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.71 | 1.26 | +2.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.15 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 1.27 | +2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | 3.99 | +13.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTUS | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 0.86 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.07 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.20 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum NETL drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and NETL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTUS | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -51.48% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -9.16% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | -19.30% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | -30.74% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -3.68% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -11.65% | +7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.91% | -1.23% |
Volatility
HTUS vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is 2.47%, while NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that HTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTUS | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 3.66% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 9.66% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 13.57% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 17.94% | +1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 25.92% | -4.47% |
HTUS vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTUS vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than NETL's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.68% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.83% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTUS and NETL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NETL has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to HTUS (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTUS dropped -47.50% vs NETL's -51.48%.
On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 15.35% vs 1.33% for NETL. On fees, NETL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NETL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 4.83% for NETL.
HTUS is categorized as Long-Short, while NETL is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 0.60% for NETL.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTUS and NETL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer