HTUS vs. HTEC
HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) and HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. HTUS is actively managed, while HTEC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTUS returned 14.66%/yr vs -5.86%/yr for HTEC. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTUS charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HTEC.
Performance
HTUS vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's -0.55% return.
HTUS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
HTEC
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- -5.86%
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 8.95% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 8.26% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | -0.55% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -2.94% | -33.72% | -0.28% | 65.01% | 8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and HTEC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between HTUS and HTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTUS vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
HTUS
HTEC
HTUS vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTUS | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.24 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 1.77 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 4.22 | +9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and HTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTUS | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -57.53% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -16.31% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | -28.67% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | -56.10% | +31.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -31.59% | +28.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -29.00% | +24.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 6.81% | -5.06% |
Volatility
HTUS vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is 4.02%, while ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that HTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTUS | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 6.74% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 15.77% | -5.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 20.92% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 24.50% | -5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.49% | 25.46% | -3.97% |
HTUS vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTUS vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, more than HTEC's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.91% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTUS and HTEC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTEC has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to HTUS (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTUS dropped -47.50% vs HTEC's -57.53%.
On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 14.66% vs -5.86% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 14.66% return vs -5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.99% for HTEC.
HTUS is categorized as Long-Short, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 0.68% for HTEC.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTUS and HTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer