HTRB vs. MBS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HTRB (Hartford Total Return Bond ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HTRB returned 5.77% vs 6.88% for MBS. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTRB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MBS.

Performance

HTRB vs. MBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTRB achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than MBS's 0.62% return.

HTRB

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 0.10%
• 1Y: 5.77%
• 3Y*: 4.63%
• 5Y*: 0.40%
• 10Y*: —

MBS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 6.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTRB vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HTRB Hartford Total Return Bond ETF	0.26%	7.38%	3.58%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.62%	8.13%	5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between HTRB and MBS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2024	0.67

The correlation between HTRB and MBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HTRB vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTRB

HTRB Risk / Return Rank: 42
HTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
HTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
HTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 42
HTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
HTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 39

MBS

MBS Risk / Return Rank: 69
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTRB vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTRB	MBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.36	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	3.54	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.45	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	3.14	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.09	9.89	-3.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTRB vs. MBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the MBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTRB and MBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTRB	MBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	2.36	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	1.60	-1.20

Drawdowns

HTRB vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTRB drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, which is greater than MBS's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTRB and MBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTRB	MBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.48%	-4.09%	-15.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	-2.20%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-1.46%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-1.02%	-3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.70%	+0.25%

Volatility

HTRB vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) at 0.90%. This indicates that HTRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTRB	MBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	0.90%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.73%	2.00%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.85%	2.93%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.12%	3.99%	+2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.57%	3.99%	+1.58%

HTRB vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTRB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTRB vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison

HTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than MBS's 5.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HTRB Hartford Total Return Bond ETF	4.63%	4.66%	4.45%	3.87%	3.08%	4.22%	4.79%	6.30%	2.37%	0.96%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.61%	5.28%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTRB and MBS in my portfolio?

HTRB and MBS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HTRB or MBS?

HTRB has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to MBS (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTRB dropped -19.48% vs MBS's -4.09%.

Which ETF is better, HTRB or MBS?

On 1-year performance, MBS leads with 6.88% vs 5.77% for HTRB. On fees, HTRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HTRB or MBS?

Over the 1-year period, MBS has performed better with a 6.88% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTRB or MBS?

HTRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HTRB or MBS?

MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 4.63% for HTRB.

What is the main difference between HTRB and MBS?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HTRB and 0.49% for MBS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.