PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTRB vs. HFGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HTRB vs. HFGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) and Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HTRB vs. HFGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HTRB
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
-0.06%7.38%2.35%7.15%-14.36%-0.07%
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
-9.27%15.52%40.73%42.45%-36.69%-5.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTRB achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than HFGO's -9.27% return.


HTRB

1D
0.15%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.62%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*

HFGO

1D
1.43%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
-9.27%
6M
-9.07%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HTRB vs. HFGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTRB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HFGO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HTRB vs. HFGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTRB
HTRB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

HFGO
HFGO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HFGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HFGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFGO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTRB vs. HFGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) and Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTRBHFGODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

0.73

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.33

1.20

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.03

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.48

3.37

+1.11

HTRB vs. HFGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTRB Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the HFGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTRB and HFGO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTRBHFGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.73

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.21

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between HTRB and HFGO is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HTRB vs. HFGO - Dividend Comparison

HTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTRB
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
4.67%4.66%4.45%3.87%3.08%4.22%4.79%6.30%2.37%0.96%
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HTRB vs. HFGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTRB drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, smaller than the maximum HFGO drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTRB and HFGO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HTRBHFGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.48%

-44.64%

+25.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-18.29%

+15.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-13.36%

+11.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-16.62%

+11.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

5.58%

-4.57%

Volatility

HTRB vs. HFGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) is 1.74%, while Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that HTRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HTRBHFGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

7.92%

-6.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

14.44%

-11.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

24.57%

-20.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.11%

26.16%

-20.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.60%

26.16%

-20.56%