HTEC vs. URNM
HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) and URNM (NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while URNM is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTEC returned -4.88%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for URNM. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTEC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.
Performance
HTEC vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTEC achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's 11.97% return.
HTEC
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 26.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- -4.88%
- 10Y*
- —
URNM
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- 11.97%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 52.67%
- 3Y*
- 27.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- —
HTEC vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | -2.96% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -2.94% | -33.72% | -0.28% | 65.01% | 1.21% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 11.97% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 68.36% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTEC and URNM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.39 |
The correlation between HTEC and URNM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HTEC vs. URNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HTEC
URNM
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
HTEC
URNM
-
Financial Services
HTEC
URNM
-
Technology
HTEC
URNM
-
Industrials
HTEC
URNM
-
Energy
HTEC
URNM
Basic Materials
HTEC
-
URNM
Communication Services
HTEC
-
URNM
-
Consumer Cyclical
HTEC
-
URNM
-
Consumer Defensive
HTEC
-
URNM
-
Real Estate
HTEC
-
URNM
-
Utilities
HTEC
-
URNM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTEC vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank
HTEC
URNM
HTEC vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTEC | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.65 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 3.59 | +0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTEC | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.03 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.32 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.67 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
HTEC vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTEC drawdown since its inception was -57.53%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTEC and URNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTEC | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.53% | -50.78% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.31% | -32.04% | +15.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.67% | -50.78% | +22.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.10% | -50.78% | -5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.25% | -26.82% | -6.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.99% | -18.03% | -10.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 14.71% | -8.14% |
Volatility
HTEC vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) is 5.82%, while NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that HTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTEC | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 16.19% | -10.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 40.32% | -25.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.32% | 51.69% | -31.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.39% | 48.30% | -23.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 46.90% | -21.44% |
HTEC vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTEC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTEC vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
HTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than URNM's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 1.01% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.84% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTEC and URNM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URNM has higher volatility (16.19%) compared to HTEC (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTEC dropped -57.53% vs URNM's -50.78%.
On 5-year performance, URNM leads with 15.58% vs -4.88% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HTEC has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, URNM has performed better with a 15.58% return vs -4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.
URNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.01% for HTEC.
HTEC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while URNM is Commodity Producers Equities. HTEC tracks ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while URNM tracks North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HTEC and 0.85% for URNM.
HTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTEC and URNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer