PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTEC vs. EMQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTEC vs. EMQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTEC achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly higher than EMQQ's -19.80% return.


HTEC

1D
0.67%
1M
3.12%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-3.90%
1Y
26.68%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
-4.88%
10Y*

EMQQ

1D
-2.68%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
-19.80%
6M
-21.08%
1Y
-15.68%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
-11.29%
10Y*
4.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTEC vs. EMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HTEC
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF
-2.96%23.91%2.68%-2.94%-33.72%-0.28%65.01%9.34%
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
-19.80%20.66%13.79%4.48%-30.70%-32.53%80.45%14.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HTEC and EMQQ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019

0.59

The correlation between HTEC and EMQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HTEC vs. EMQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HTEC
EMQQ

Healthcare

77.3%
0.0%

Financial Services

3.9%
3.6%

Technology

3.7%
8.2%

Industrials

1.3%
0.3%

Energy

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

33.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Healthcare

HTEC
77.3%
EMQQ
0.0%

Financial Services

HTEC
3.9%
EMQQ
3.6%

Technology

HTEC
3.7%
EMQQ
8.2%

Industrials

HTEC
1.3%
EMQQ
0.3%

Energy

HTEC
1.2%
EMQQ

-

Basic Materials

HTEC

-

EMQQ

-

Communication Services

HTEC

-

EMQQ
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HTEC

-

EMQQ
33.1%

Consumer Defensive

HTEC

-

EMQQ
0.2%

Real Estate

HTEC

-

EMQQ
2.7%

Utilities

HTEC

-

EMQQ
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTEC vs. EMQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTEC
HTEC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

EMQQ
EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTEC vs. EMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTECEMQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.89

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

-0.53

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.07

-1.04

+5.12

HTEC vs. EMQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the EMQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTEC and EMQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTECEMQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

-0.76

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

-0.34

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.09

+0.12

Drawdowns

HTEC vs. EMQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTEC drawdown since its inception was -57.53%, smaller than the maximum EMQQ drawdown of -73.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTEC and EMQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTECEMQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.53%

-73.24%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-29.96%

+13.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.67%

-29.96%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.10%

-66.31%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.25%

-57.75%

+24.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.99%

-31.36%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

15.04%

-8.47%

Volatility

HTEC vs. EMQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) is 5.82%, while EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that HTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTECEMQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

7.04%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

16.37%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.32%

20.59%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.39%

33.12%

-8.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.46%

30.61%

-5.15%

HTEC vs. EMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTEC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTEC vs. EMQQ - Dividend Comparison

HTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than EMQQ's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
3.85%3.09%1.70%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.18%1.29%0.00%0.94%0.75%0.08%
HTEC
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF
1.01%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HTEC and EMQQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMQQ has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to HTEC (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTEC dropped -57.53% vs EMQQ's -73.24%.

On 5-year performance, HTEC leads with -4.88% vs -11.29% for EMQQ. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HTEC has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HTEC has performed better with a -4.88% return vs -11.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.

EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 1.01% for HTEC.

HTEC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EMQQ is Emerging Markets Equities. HTEC tracks ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HTEC and 0.86% for EMQQ.

HTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTEC and EMQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer