HTEC vs. EMQQ
HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) and EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTEC returned -5.86%/yr vs -12.41%/yr for EMQQ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTEC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMQQ.
Performance
HTEC vs. EMQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTEC achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly higher than EMQQ's -24.03% return.
HTEC
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- -5.86%
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -24.03%
- 6M
- -23.90%
- 1Y
- -21.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- -12.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
HTEC vs. EMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | -0.55% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -2.94% | -33.72% | -0.28% | 65.01% | 8.28% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -24.03% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 11.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTEC and EMQQ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between HTEC and EMQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HTEC vs. EMQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HTEC
EMQQ
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
HTEC
EMQQ
Financial Services
HTEC
EMQQ
Technology
HTEC
EMQQ
Industrials
HTEC
EMQQ
Energy
HTEC
EMQQ
-
Basic Materials
HTEC
-
EMQQ
-
Communication Services
HTEC
-
EMQQ
Consumer Cyclical
HTEC
-
EMQQ
Consumer Defensive
HTEC
-
EMQQ
Real Estate
HTEC
-
EMQQ
Utilities
HTEC
-
EMQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTEC vs. EMQQ — Risk / Return Rank
HTEC
EMQQ
HTEC vs. EMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTEC | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.84 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | -0.67 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | -1.31 | +5.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTEC vs. EMQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTEC drawdown since its inception was -57.53%, smaller than the maximum EMQQ drawdown of -73.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTEC and EMQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTEC | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.53% | -73.24% | +15.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.31% | -32.55% | +16.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.67% | -32.55% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.10% | -66.31% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.59% | -59.98% | +28.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.00% | -31.47% | +2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.81% | 16.56% | -9.75% |
Volatility
HTEC vs. EMQQ - Volatility Comparison
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) at 5.99%. This indicates that HTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTEC | EMQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 5.99% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.77% | 16.76% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.92% | 20.77% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 33.14% | -8.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 30.61% | -5.15% |
HTEC vs. EMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTEC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTEC vs. EMQQ - Dividend Comparison
HTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than EMQQ's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 4.07% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTEC and EMQQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTEC has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to EMQQ (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTEC dropped -57.53% vs EMQQ's -73.24%.
On 5-year performance, HTEC leads with -5.86% vs -12.41% for EMQQ. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTEC has performed better with a -5.86% return vs -12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.99% for HTEC.
HTEC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EMQQ is Emerging Markets Equities. HTEC tracks ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HTEC and 0.86% for EMQQ.
HTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTEC and EMQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer