HSTC.L vs. KROG.L
HSTC.L (HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF) and KROG.L (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from HSBC and Global X respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HSTC.L returned 6.84%/yr vs -1.99%/yr for KROG.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
HSTC.L vs. KROG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSTC.L achieves a -10.22% return, which is significantly lower than KROG.L's 15.55% return.
HSTC.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- -10.22%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- -4.10%
- 3Y*
- 6.84%
- 5Y*
- -8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
KROG.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- -1.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSTC.L vs. KROG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSTC.L HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF | -10.22% | 16.17% | 21.37% | -13.38% | -18.04% |
KROG.L Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 15.55% | 0.36% | -6.89% | -26.89% | -14.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSTC.L and KROG.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.34 |
The correlation between HSTC.L and KROG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSTC.L vs. KROG.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSTC.L
KROG.L
HSTC.L vs. KROG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSTC.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.15 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.52 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 3.05 | -3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSTC.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 0.80 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | -0.45 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
HSTC.L vs. KROG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -69.93%, which is greater than KROG.L's maximum drawdown of -51.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSTC.L and KROG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSTC.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.93% | -51.38% | -18.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.97% | -8.21% | -21.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.73% | -28.00% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.55% | -38.55% | -14.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.05% | -34.39% | -15.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.69% | 4.12% | +12.57% |
Volatility
HSTC.L vs. KROG.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) at 5.64%. This indicates that HSTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSTC.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.05% | 5.64% | +4.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.62% | 12.21% | +6.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.80% | 15.69% | +10.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.00% | 19.47% | +18.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.64% | 19.47% | +18.17% |
HSTC.L vs. KROG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HSTC.L and KROG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
HSTC.L vs. KROG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HSTC.L nor KROG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HSTC.L and KROG.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSTC.L and KROG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Global X.
Find the right allocation for HSTC.L and KROG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer