PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HSTC.L vs. BABA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


HSTC.LBABA
YTD Return17.41%19.71%
1Y Return6.18%12.10%
3Y Return (Ann)-11.02%-17.44%
Sharpe Ratio0.060.38
Sortino Ratio0.360.81
Omega Ratio1.041.10
Calmar Ratio0.030.18
Martin Ratio0.141.11
Ulcer Index15.98%12.88%
Daily Std Dev36.68%37.87%
Max Drawdown-69.93%-80.09%
Current Drawdown-55.99%-70.35%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between HSTC.L and BABA is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

HSTC.L vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HSTC.L achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's 19.71% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.50%
14.59%
HSTC.L
BABA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HSTC.L vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSTC.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HSTC.L, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HSTC.L, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.65
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HSTC.L, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HSTC.L, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HSTC.L, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.000.66
BABA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BABA, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BABA, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BABA, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BABA, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BABA, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.04

HSTC.L vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSTC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSTC.L and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.26
0.52
HSTC.L
BABA

Dividends

HSTC.L vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

HSTC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.


TTM2023
HSTC.L
HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.80%1.29%

Drawdowns

HSTC.L vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -69.93%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSTC.L and BABA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-59.64%
-65.28%
HSTC.L
BABA

Volatility

HSTC.L vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) has a higher volatility of 13.39% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 10.26%. This indicates that HSTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.39%
10.26%
HSTC.L
BABA